- 1. [SECC] Electronic log for GQP (score: 1)
- Author: k4bai at worldnet.att.net (John Laney)
- Date: Tue, 01 Jul 2003 10:54:32 -0500
- I suspect it is less "necessary" for frequency control of the rig than to have the F keys available to send CW. At our place using the N3FJP FD program, it turned out that we needed two serial ports
- /archives//html/SECC/2003-07/msg00001.html (6,280 bytes)
- 2. [SECC] Electronic log for GQP (score: 1)
- Author: lshuman at griffin.uga.edu (Larry Shuman)
- Date: Mon, 30 Jun 2003 11:07:05 -0500
- SECC leadership, Although I am not a SECC member, I would like to voice my opinion. I agree with John. I am one who would be affected by the electronic submission rule. I am a newcomer to contesting
- /archives//html/SECC/2003-06/msg00058.html (6,779 bytes)
- 3. [SECC] Electronic log for GQP (score: 1)
- Author: ku8e at bellsouth.net (ku8e@bellsouth.net)
- Date: Mon, 30 Jun 2003 13:43:37 -0500
- Larry .. I think the spirit of rule is to try to get those who DO use a computer to send us electronic logs and NOT paper printouts from the logging programs. I would venture to say that 99.9 % of th
- /archives//html/SECC/2003-06/msg00059.html (9,459 bytes)
- 4. [SECC] Electronic log for GQP (score: 1)
- Author: k4sb at earthlink.net (K4SB)
- Date: Mon, 30 Jun 2003 14:47:30 -0500
- Larry Shuman wrote: don't have a computer......... Why is it necessary to interface a computer to the rig? All that does is give you a frequency readout and auto band change. Larry, if you'll pick it
- /archives//html/SECC/2003-06/msg00060.html (6,814 bytes)
- 5. [SECC] Electronic log for GQP (score: 1)
- Author: aa4ga at contesting.com (Lee Hiers)
- Date: Mon, 30 Jun 2003 21:01:37 -0500
- After operating FD this past weekend w/o an interfaced rig (first time in a *long* time!), I definitely consider it necessary.... -- Lee Hiers, AA4GA Cornelia, Georgia
- /archives//html/SECC/2003-06/msg00066.html (6,396 bytes)
This search system is powered by
Namazu