Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[SECC\]\s+CQ\s+WW\s+CW\s+honor\s+roll\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[SECC\]\s+CQ\s+WW\s+CW\s+honor\s+roll\s*$/: 2 ]

Total 2 documents matching your query.

1. [SECC] CQ WW CW honor roll (score: 1): Author: k4no@ispchannel.com (greg richard); Date: Sun, 12 Nov 2000 11:16:18 -0600; Is that supposed to be a good thing? I'm on there but on the very last page. What is an acceptable "busted" ratio? Greg K4NO -- SECC on the Web: http://secc.contesting.com/ Submissions: secc@contest; /archives//html/SECC/2000-11/msg00060.html (6,845 bytes)
2. [SECC] CQ WW CW honor roll (score: 1): Author: k4bai@worldnet.att.net (John T. Laney, III); Date: Sun, 12 Nov 2000 14:21:02 -0500; I'd think that anything on the Honor Roll is "acceptable." But we always try to improve. I'm very proud of the 8P9Z multi single listing on that Honor Roll. 73, John. -- SECC on the Web: http://secc.; /archives//html/SECC/2000-11/msg00061.html (6,809 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 2
Page: [1]