Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[SECC\]\s+Bellsouth\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[SECC\]\s+Bellsouth\s*$/: 8 ]

Total 8 documents matching your query.

1. [SECC] Bellsouth (score: 1): Author: w8ji at contesting.com (Tom Rauch); Date: Mon, 14 Jan 2008 17:50:28 -0500; I'm not sure BellSouth customers know this, but BellSouth filters mail in and out of BellSouth. For example BellSouth prevents anyone using QTH.com mail service from sending mail to any BellSouth sub; /archives//html/SECC/2008-01/msg00061.html (7,146 bytes)
2. [SECC] Bellsouth (score: 1): Author: lee.hiers at gmail.com (Lee Hiers); Date: Mon, 14 Jan 2008 18:06:11 -0500; Bellsouth doesn't allow incoming mail connections from mail servers with dynamic IPs. There are many ISPs that do this and other measures to "protect" their customers....unfortunately. -- Lee Hiers,; /archives//html/SECC/2008-01/msg00062.html (7,155 bytes)
3. [SECC] Bellsouth (score: 1): Author: w8ji at contesting.com (Tom Rauch); Date: Mon, 14 Jan 2008 19:03:22 -0500; Worse yet Lee BellSouth does not allow me to send email via their Internet connection through other services!! My point is just to remind people in this area if they use BellSouth they are automatic; /archives//html/SECC/2008-01/msg00063.html (7,487 bytes)
4. [SECC] Bellsouth (score: 1): Author: nj8j at benshome.net (Ben Coleman); Date: Mon, 14 Jan 2008 19:47:10 -0500; There are good reasons for that - like that a large chunk of spam email (which, according to the last figures I saw, now makes up at least 90% of email volume) comes from machines on dynamic IPs - ty; /archives//html/SECC/2008-01/msg00064.html (9,922 bytes)
5. [SECC] Bellsouth (score: 1): Author: lee.hiers at gmail.com (Lee Hiers); Date: Mon, 14 Jan 2008 20:28:32 -0500; I fully understand their reason. I don't doubt that 90% of the email I receive is from spammers; I no longer count it. I administer a 2700-address opt-in email list for a monthly newsletter and each; /archives//html/SECC/2008-01/msg00065.html (8,822 bytes)
6. [SECC] Bellsouth (score: 1): Author: nj8j at benshome.net (Ben Coleman); Date: Mon, 14 Jan 2008 21:08:14 -0500; Nope. But if I did, I'd white-list you so it could get through. I understand that, and I do handle my own spam-prevention (hence my running my own mail server). But the vast majority of ISP customers; /archives//html/SECC/2008-01/msg00066.html (8,264 bytes)
7. [SECC] Bellsouth (score: 1): Author: aa4lr at arrl.net (Bill Coleman); Date: Fri, 18 Jan 2008 19:45:28 -0500; Are you sure this is BellSouth's doing? I ran into an issue a couple of years ago with the Elecraft list, which is run out of qth.net. Even though I am subscribed to the list, my postings were reject; /archives//html/SECC/2008-01/msg00081.html (8,144 bytes)
8. [SECC] Bellsouth (score: 1): Author: w8ji at contesting.com (Tom Rauch); Date: Fri, 18 Jan 2008 19:51:07 -0500; Absolutely. Positively. Not the slightest doubt or question at all.; /archives//html/SECC/2008-01/msg00082.html (6,928 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 8
Page: [1]