Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[SECC\]\s+Activities\s+Directors\s*$/: 17 ]

Total 17 documents matching your query.

1. [SECC] Activities Directors (score: 1)
Author: w4an@contesting.com (Bill Fisher W4AN)
Date: Fri, 2 Nov 2001 18:51:29 -0500 (EST)
I would like to propose the addition of some new positions within our club to help organize and drum up club participation. The YCCC elected K1ZM a few years back for president and Jeff did a bang-up
/archives//html/SECC/2001-11/msg00021.html (8,512 bytes)

2. [SECC] Activities Directors (score: 1)
Author: gabnjb@earthlink.net (Gary Breed)
Date: Fri, 2 Nov 2001 22:11:53 -0500
Great idea, Bill! I think the main reason the SEDXC did so well with the CQ160 contests is that those are the only contests they supported -- there are distinct advantages to concentrating on one eve
/archives//html/SECC/2001-11/msg00023.html (10,142 bytes)

3. [SECC] Activities Directors (score: 1)
Author: k4no@home.com (greg and leann richard)
Date: Sat, 3 Nov 2001 21:26:52 -0600
Great idea Bill... We need someone like "Eric Straton, Rush Chariman" from the movie Animal House. FWIW..K4XS has an ad on www.eham.com to sell some Rohn 20/25/45 tower at pretty good prices. He's dr
/archives//html/SECC/2001-11/msg00026.html (9,055 bytes)

4. [SECC] Activities Directors (score: 1)
Author: w4an@contesting.com (Bill Fisher W4AN)
Date: Fri, 2 Nov 2001 22:36:05 -0500 (EST)
I wonder if first we shouldn't find out what contests our members are interested in supporting? I agree with not trying to be all things to all contests. The NCCC does well because they put their eff
/archives//html/SECC/2001-11/msg00027.html (12,006 bytes)

5. [SECC] Activities Directors (score: 1)
Author: w4an@contesting.com (Bill Fisher W4AN)
Date: Fri, 2 Nov 2001 22:39:17 -0500 (EST)
"Hi... Bill Fisher [insert handshake], CW Sprint Rush Chairman... damned glad to me ya!" -- SECC on the Web: http://secc.contesting.com/ Submissions: secc@contesting.com Administrative requests: sec
/archives//html/SECC/2001-11/msg00028.html (8,186 bytes)

6. [SECC] Activities Directors (score: 1)
Author: aa4lr@arrl.net (Bill Coleman)
Date: Fri, 2 Nov 2001 23:49:00 -0500
Sign me up for the SSB portions of NAQP. Bill Coleman, AA4LR, PP-ASEL Mail: aa4lr@arrl.net Quote: "Not within a thousand years will man ever fly!" -- Wilbur Wright, 1901 -- SECC on the Web: http://se
/archives//html/SECC/2001-11/msg00036.html (8,052 bytes)

7. [SECC] Activities Directors (score: 1)
Author: W4OC@aol.com (W4OC@aol.com)
Date: Sat, 3 Nov 2001 08:51:32 EST
i'll take the CW SS activities position. 73 don -- SECC on the Web: http://secc.contesting.com/ Submissions: secc@contesting.com Administrative requests: secc-REQUEST@contesting.com Problems: owner-s
/archives//html/SECC/2001-11/msg00038.html (7,559 bytes)

8. [SECC] Activities Directors (score: 1)
Author: k4sb@mindspring.com (K4SB)
Date: Sat, 03 Nov 2001 17:11:41 +0000
Hell of a good idea! Ed -- SECC on the Web: http://secc.contesting.com/ Submissions: secc@contesting.com Administrative requests: secc-REQUEST@contesting.com Problems: owner-secc@contesting.com
/archives//html/SECC/2001-11/msg00040.html (9,922 bytes)

9. [SECC] Activities Directors (score: 1)
Author: k4sb@mindspring.com (K4SB)
Date: Sat, 03 Nov 2001 17:18:57 +0000
Bill's posts are so well thought out we should make him the Activities Director. Would it be a good idea to poll the members as to what modes they use the most, (ie) SSB, CW, BOTH, ect. I also second
/archives//html/SECC/2001-11/msg00041.html (8,706 bytes)

10. [SECC] Activities Directors (score: 1)
Author: ku8e1@yahoo.com (Jeffrey Clarke)
Date: Mon, 5 Nov 2001 06:26:23 -0800 (PST)
Hi Bill, We had the same problem in MRRC about what contests we should be serious in. While we want all our members to be active in all contests ARRL and CQ that's not possible for everyone with acti
/archives//html/SECC/2001-11/msg00054.html (14,714 bytes)

11. [SECC] Activities Directors (score: 1)
Author: w4an@contesting.com (Bill Fisher W4AN)
Date: Mon, 5 Nov 2001 09:31:05 -0500 (EST)
Seems like a good idea. Does someone have interest in analyzing our options? Maybe present some what-if scenarios to the club so we can all evaluate what contest we want to go after? 73 Bill -- SECC
/archives//html/SECC/2001-11/msg00055.html (8,716 bytes)

12. [SECC] Activities Directors (score: 1)
Author: gabnjb@earthlink.net (Gary Breed)
Date: Mon, 5 Nov 2001 10:40:05 -0500
-- Since I volunteered to champion the 160 'tests....If the W8JI (W4AN) score had been credited to SECC, our club would have been #3 Medium Club in the 2000 ARRL 160 contest. We have the members and
/archives//html/SECC/2001-11/msg00061.html (9,239 bytes)

13. [SECC] Activities Directors (score: 1)
Author: jpryor@arches.uga.edu (Jay Pryor)
Date: Mon, 05 Nov 2001 10:46:36 -0500
For what it's worth, my two never-miss contests are CWSS and ARRL-DX CW. 73, Jay, K4OGG -- SECC on the Web: http://secc.contesting.com/ Submissions: secc@contesting.com Administrative requests: secc
/archives//html/SECC/2001-11/msg00062.html (8,354 bytes)

14. [SECC] Activities Directors (score: 1)
Author: w4an@contesting.com (Bill Fisher W4AN)
Date: Mon, 5 Nov 2001 10:50:34 -0500 (EST)
I'm going back to W8JI this year. Maybe we should start here? I'm happy to let someone come up and operate my station that will give it a full effort. 73 Bill -- SECC on the Web: http://secc.contest
/archives//html/SECC/2001-11/msg00063.html (8,522 bytes)

15. [SECC] Activities Directors (score: 1)
Author: SteveWS4F@aol.com (SteveWS4F@aol.com)
Date: Mon, 5 Nov 2001 11:40:54 EST
ARRL 10 Meter is a natural- multimode, and one we can win. I definitely favor going after ones we can win- it's a great incentive. WPX is a natural for the same reason, as Bill has pointed out. Also,
/archives//html/SECC/2001-11/msg00065.html (8,881 bytes)

16. Fwd: [SECC] Activities Directors (score: 1)
Author: SteveWS4F@aol.com (SteveWS4F@aol.com)
Date: Mon, 5 Nov 2001 11:44:27 EST
--part1_157.385e0b3.29181beb_boundary Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit natural favor I meant ARRL 160 in the above, but CQ 160 CW would be good, too. 73, S
/archives//html/SECC/2001-11/msg00066.html (10,216 bytes)

17. [SECC] Activities Directors (score: 1)
Author: gabnjb@earthlink.net (Gary Breed)
Date: Tue, 6 Nov 2001 00:33:49 -0500
-- OK, I think we have our first coordinated effort! I am now the official SECC cheerleader and arm-twister for the ARRL160 contest. Ken, N4UK just got a new vertical up and I'll bet he's ready for
/archives//html/SECC/2001-11/msg00076.html (8,757 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu