Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[SECC\]\s+ARRL\s+Sweepstakes\s+SSB\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[SECC\]\s+ARRL\s+Sweepstakes\s+SSB\s*$/: 5 ]

Total 5 documents matching your query.

1. [SECC] ARRL Sweepstakes SSB (score: 1): Author: GMacie at innotrac.com (Macie, Gordon); Date: Wed, 28 Apr 2004 11:42:49 -0500; I am shown as the Southeast Division winner for the low power category. This would be wonderfull except I should be shown in the unlimited category. I had sent the ARRL an email when I first submitte; /archives//html/SECC/2004-04/msg00129.html (6,967 bytes)
2. [SECC] ARRL Sweepstakes SSB (score: 1): Author: w4atl at earthlink.net (Sherman Banks); Date: Wed, 28 Apr 2004 19:05:31 -0500; Thanks! It is hard to get the class right with the contest software. I always have to double check the Cabrillo to make sure I have the class right. Usually it gets bounced the first time. Off to che; /archives//html/SECC/2004-04/msg00131.html (8,135 bytes)
3. [SECC] ARRL Sweepstakes SSB (score: 1): Author: GMacie at innotrac.com (Macie, Gordon); Date: Thu, 29 Apr 2004 10:38:00 -0500; They fixed it within about an hour yesterday... Great response.. 73 Gordon Thanks! It is hard to get the class right with the contest software. I always have to double check the Cabrillo to make sure; /archives//html/SECC/2004-04/msg00133.html (8,419 bytes)
4. [SECC] ARRL Sweepstakes SSB (score: 1): Author: aa4lr at mac.com (Bill Coleman); Date: Fri, 30 Apr 2004 06:40:36 -0500; Great Job, Sherm! Looks like you beat me soundly on 40m and 15m. Just wait 'til next time.... Also interesting that Sherm didn't work a big percentage on 80m compared to myself and others (K4SSU, K4B; /archives//html/SECC/2004-04/msg00134.html (7,377 bytes)
5. [SECC] ARRL Sweepstakes SSB (score: 1): Author: aa4lr at arrl.net (Bill Coleman); Date: Fri, 30 Apr 2004 07:56:22 -0500; Great Job, Sherm! Looks like you beat me soundly on 40m and 15m. Just wait 'til next time.... Also interesting that Sherm didn't work a big percentage on 80m compared to myself and others (K4SSU, K4B; /archives//html/SECC/2004-04/msg00135.html (7,405 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 5
Page: [1]