Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[SECC\]\s+ARRL\s+SS\s+CW\s+2006\s+Scores\s+Available\s+to\s+ARRL\s+Members\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[SECC\]\s+ARRL\s+SS\s+CW\s+2006\s+Scores\s+Available\s+to\s+ARRL\s+Members\s*$/: 11 ]

Total 11 documents matching your query.

1. [SECC] ARRL SS CW 2006 Scores Available to ARRL Members (score: 1): Author: k4bai at worldnet.att.net (John Laney); Date: Tue, 13 Mar 2007 14:43:28 -0500; Very interesting. You can sort by ARRL Section or by Club. We can see who in GA or AL is not submitting scores for a club and solicit their membership. Too bad they didn't follow through and fill in; /archives//html/SECC/2007-03/msg00051.html (7,962 bytes)
2. [SECC] ARRL SS CW 2006 Scores Available to ARRL Members (score: 1): Author: ku8e at bellsouth.net (ku8e at bellsouth.net); Date: Tue, 13 Mar 2007 16:28:52 -0500; See http://www.arrl.org/members-only/contests/results/2006/ss-cw/accuracy.html John made the accuracy list; /archives//html/SECC/2007-03/msg00053.html (8,778 bytes)
3. [SECC] ARRL SS CW 2006 Scores Available to ARRL Members (score: 1): Author: lee.hiers at gmail.com (Lee Hiers); Date: Tue, 13 Mar 2007 18:35:18 -0400; Great job, John. Unfortunately, the ARRL did not make the accuracy list. Do the math on KU8E's score. Either he has less Qs than they're reporting, or his score should be higher. -- Lee Hiers, AA4GA; /archives//html/SECC/2007-03/msg00054.html (8,061 bytes)
4. [SECC] ARRL SS CW 2006 Scores Available to ARRL Members (score: 1): Author: ku8e at bellsouth.net (ku8e); Date: Tue, 13 Mar 2007 22:50:20 -0400; Congrats to Jay, K4OGG for winning A power for Georgia. What a close race ! See http://www.arrl.org/members-only/contests/results/2006/ss-cw/close.html -- Original Message -- From: "John Laney" <k4ba; /archives//html/SECC/2007-03/msg00055.html (8,785 bytes)
5. [SECC] ARRL SS CW 2006 Scores Available to ARRL Members (score: 1): Author: ku8e at bellsouth.net (ku8e); Date: Tue, 13 Mar 2007 23:21:14 -0400; Good catch Lee .... I just brought up the score in N1MM and here is what I submitted (claimed) band by band 80: 218 40: 361 20: 246 15: 3 -- TOTAL : 828 * 80 = 132480 They have : 80: 208 40: 344 20:; /archives//html/SECC/2007-03/msg00056.html (7,848 bytes)
6. [SECC] ARRL SS CW 2006 Scores Available to ARRL Members (score: 1): Author: jpryor at uga.edu (Jay Pryor); Date: Wed, 14 Mar 2007 08:49:50 -0400; Thanks for the earlier congrats Jeff -- but I agree with you and with Lee that something is wrong somewhere. K4OGG 808 QSOs and 80 sections = 129,280 points KU8E 812 QSOs and 80 sections = 128,640 po; /archives//html/SECC/2007-03/msg00057.html (8,999 bytes)
7. [SECC] ARRL SS CW 2006 Scores Available to ARRL Members (score: 1): Author: w4atl at earthlink.net (Sherman Banks); Date: Wed, 14 Mar 2007 09:11:06 -0500; Isn't there an additional QSO removed from the final score for each error made? So that would mean if you messed up copying a QSO, that QSO would be removed, plus a one QSO penalty. I can't find it i; /archives//html/SECC/2007-03/msg00058.html (10,496 bytes)
8. [SECC] ARRL SS CW 2006 Scores Available to ARRL Members (score: 1): Author: k9ay at k9ay.com (K9AY); Date: Wed, 14 Mar 2007 09:26:06 -0500; My recollection is-- A busted QSO is simply removed, including busted calls where they find you in the log of a guy with a similar call. NIL has a one QSO penalty. I can't remember if the results sh; /archives//html/SECC/2007-03/msg00059.html (8,489 bytes)
9. [SECC] ARRL SS CW 2006 Scores Available to ARRL Members (score: 1): Author: lee.hiers at gmail.com (Lee Hiers); Date: Wed, 14 Mar 2007 13:07:45 -0400; If I recall correctly, the penalty QSOs are (should be) reflected in the "published" line scores. The Qs X Mults X 2 = Score equation should work with the numbers they've posted, but they don't. -- L; /archives//html/SECC/2007-03/msg00061.html (8,669 bytes)
10. [SECC] ARRL SS CW 2006 Scores Available to ARRL Members (score: 1): Author: thompson at mindspring.com (David Thompson); Date: Wed, 14 Mar 2007 14:39:27 -0500; The ARRL scoring software has already done all the penalties. So if everything is equal then the high QSO should beat a lower QSO with sections being equal. 73 Dave K4JRB; /archives//html/SECC/2007-03/msg00062.html (11,907 bytes)
11. [SECC] ARRL SS CW 2006 Scores Available to ARRL Members (score: 1): Author: ku8e at bellsouth.net (ku8e at bellsouth.net); Date: Fri, 16 Mar 2007 09:51:40 -0500; Looks like they fixed the ARRL webpage. My score is now listed as 804 * 80. Their band breakdowns are still not right. Call Score QSOs Mult Class Section Check Hours 160 80 40 20 15 10 Club Ops 1 K4O; /archives//html/SECC/2007-03/msg00064.html (8,701 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 11
Page: [1]