Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[SECC\]\s+\[Fwd\:\s+\[CQ\-Contest\]\s+CQ\s+WW\s+CW\s+Categories\]\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[SECC\]\s+\[Fwd\:\s+\[CQ\-Contest\]\s+CQ\s+WW\s+CW\s+Categories\]\s*$/: 2 ]

Total 2 documents matching your query.

1. [SECC] [Fwd: [CQ-Contest] CQ WW CW Categories] (score: 1): Author: k4bai@worldnet.att.net (John T. Laney, III); Date: Sun, 08 Jul 2001 21:29:56 -0400; This is a multi-part message in MIME format. --E82FAF5B2EBA523154C98AC4 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Hi Guys: Note this message from K3EST. Be sure to ch; /archives//html/SECC/2001-07/msg00022.html (8,772 bytes)
2. [SECC] [Fwd: [CQ-Contest] CQ WW CW Categories] (score: 1): Author: n4uk@mindspring.com (n4uk@mindspring.com); Date: Sun, 08 Jul 2001 23:14:24 -0400; What else is new? I'm sick of CQs inability to get it right. They have lost interest in taking their sponsored contests seriously. Last year they took out a mult from my 10m log that pushed me from 2; /archives//html/SECC/2001-07/msg00023.html (7,691 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 2
Page: [1]