Mail Archive Search: <+from:w8ji at w8ji.com>

Results:

References: [ +from:w8ji: 83 ] [ at (Too many documents hit. Ignored) ] [ w8ji.com: 65 ]

Total 50 documents matching your query.

41. [SECC] WW4LL Antenna (score: 139): Author: w8ji at w8ji.com (Tom W8JI); Date: Mon, 18 Oct 2010 12:44:44 -0400; A group of members went to Fred WW4LL's house Saturday and got Freddie's new Opti-beams in the air. As far as I know everyone had a great time, and the antennas looked really good up in the air. Thes; /archives//html/SECC/2010-10/msg00068.html (6,776 bytes)
42. [SECC] Lightning protection (score: 139): Author: w8ji at w8ji.com (Tom W8JI); Date: Mon, 18 Oct 2010 12:52:36 -0400; In case members don't know, I've been putting together some different web pages on lightning protection. While there are a variety of opinions of what is best, keep in mind my radios stay connected 2; /archives//html/SECC/2010-10/msg00069.html (6,621 bytes)
43. [SECC] Question about 30 meter halfwave vertical for the antennagurus (score: 139): Author: w8ji at w8ji.com (Tom W8JI); Date: Wed, 20 Oct 2010 10:54:44 -0400; I got one of the 43' verticals from DX Engineering and was thoroughly impressed with the construction and nice way it tilts up. I wasn't so impressed with it's perfomance, but "nothing ventured, Noth; /archives//html/SECC/2010-10/msg00079.html (12,009 bytes)
44. [SECC] Fw: 40/80 Meter array (score: 139): Author: w8ji at w8ji.com (W8JI Tom); Date: Fri, 22 Oct 2010 16:59:06 -0400; << I use two of these. On 40 they are a 1/4 wave apart and on 80 they are 1/8 apart. On 40 I am feeding them with 84 degree lines and a 71 degree delay line that is switched in. On 80 I am feeding th; /archives//html/SECC/2010-10/msg00089.html (7,084 bytes)
45. [SECC] Question about 30 meter halfwave vertical for the antennagurus (score: 139): Author: w8ji at w8ji.com (Tom W8JI); Date: Sat, 23 Oct 2010 12:05:25 -0400; I shunt-feed my 15m (50 foot) tower on 160m. I've got 160m WAS, and 25 countries confirmed, all with 100 watts. http://boringhamradiopart.blogspot.com/2009/04/shunt-feeding-short-tower-on-80-and.html; /archives//html/SECC/2010-10/msg00091.html (8,958 bytes)
46. [SECC] CQWW SSB FRUSTRATING! (score: 139): Author: w8ji at w8ji.com (Tom W8JI); Date: Sat, 30 Oct 2010 08:27:49 -0400; I would expect not at the start of a major DX contest!!! You will do a whole lot better towards the end of the contest or during slow times. Right now people wanting a high rate always answer the to; /archives//html/SECC/2010-10/msg00119.html (7,147 bytes)
47. [SECC] Fwd: Re: [RTTY] FIRST Top Band (160m) Digital QSO Party (score: 139): Author: w8ji at w8ji.com (Tom W8JI); Date: Tue, 14 Sep 2010 10:43:36 -0400; I wonder what the correct dates and times are. :-); /archives//html/SECC/2010-09/msg00111.html (6,912 bytes)
48. [SECC] Adjusting tuners (score: 139): Author: w8ji at w8ji.com (Tom W8JI); Date: Sun, 19 Sep 2010 22:03:05 -0400; Here are some very simple useful tips for anyone using a conventional T network tuner: There are a nearly infinite combination of settings that can produce a match. When you adjust any T network tun; /archives//html/SECC/2010-09/msg00152.html (7,863 bytes)
49. [SECC] Adjusting tuners (score: 139): Author: w8ji at w8ji.com (Tom W8JI); Date: Mon, 20 Sep 2010 21:33:28 -0400; It isn't resonance Jeff and it isn't match that causes the problem. A setting that shows a 1:1 SWR can have terrible voltages or good voltages. The problem is how things are tuned. You always should; /archives//html/SECC/2010-09/msg00159.html (9,262 bytes)
50. [SECC] W4AN Claimed Score, 2010 IARU HF Championship (score: 139): Author: w8ji at w8ji.com (Tom W8JI); Date: Mon, 12 Jul 2010 07:38:28 -0400; This came through blank to me. -- Original Message -- From: "John T. Laney III" <k4bai at att.net> To: "secc" <secc at contesting.com>; "ACG" <contest at alabamacontestgroup.org>; <K1to at aol.com>;; /archives//html/SECC/2010-07/msg00076.html (6,838 bytes)

Current List: 41 - 50
Page: [1] [2] [3]