Mail Archive Search: <+from:ne4s at yahoo.com>

Results:

References: [ +from:ne4s: 411 ] [ at (Too many documents hit. Ignored) ] [ yahoo.com: 1623 ]

Total 410 documents matching your query.

341. [SECC] Re AA4LR comment on a claim jumper (score: 64): Author: mrcne4s at yahoo.com (Michael Condon); Date: Mon, 30 Jan 2006 08:06:54 -0800 (PST); FWIW I had someone jump my Freq, low on the band, and give me some QRM. I do think it was a xx3x call, but I didn't jot it down. When I slid down to clear, after giving notice a few time, he did the; /archives//html/SECC/2006-01/msg00144.html (7,846 bytes)
342. [SECC] Re AA4LR comment on a claim jumper (score: 64): Author: mrcne4s at yahoo.com (Michael Condon); Date: Mon, 30 Jan 2006 15:09:40 -0800 (PST); The quick answer is "all of it"... The reality is "none"... But on CW with a 250 Hz filter on, someone inside of 100-150 Hz is getting close. I often work with someone who is positioned to produce ze; /archives//html/SECC/2006-01/msg00147.html (9,037 bytes)
343. [SECC] GQP rules (score: 64): Author: mrcne4s at yahoo.com (Michael Condon); Date: Thu, 1 Dec 2005 06:22:23 -0800 (PST); Dear friends... This is to remind you to take a look at the new proposed rules for GQP as are now posted on the web site www.gqp.contesting.com . I had put a note out last week, but most folks were b; /archives//html/SECC/2005-12/msg00000.html (8,022 bytes)
344. [SECC] GQP link (score: 64): Author: mrcne4s at yahoo.com (Michael Condon); Date: Fri, 2 Dec 2005 06:01:14 -0800 (PST); Hi, Here is a link to GQP that should work. http://gqp.contesting.com/index.htm Mike, NE4S Please use mike at mcnet.us as my address. Be well, Thanks -- Yahoo! Personals Single? There's someone we'd; /archives//html/SECC/2005-12/msg00014.html (6,239 bytes)
345. [SECC] GQP changes (score: 64): Author: mrcne4s at yahoo.com (Michael Condon); Date: Tue, 6 Dec 2005 15:25:46 -0800 (PST); All, I have had some feedback that the basic rules are OK. I have put in a couple of items that were commented here. We can refine more as we go. On the start and end times from, I would like to hear; /archives//html/SECC/2005-12/msg00069.html (8,719 bytes)
346. [SECC] GQP changes (score: 64): Author: mrcne4s at yahoo.com (Michael Condon); Date: Wed, 7 Dec 2005 07:05:45 -0800 (PST); Hi, Thanks to Matt and John, and others on the comments on "3 Minimum" entries. Several have pointed out that this change would penalize an entrant for the activities or lack therof of "others". Matt; /archives//html/SECC/2005-12/msg00080.html (11,187 bytes)
347. [SECC] GQP changes (score: 64): Author: mrcne4s at yahoo.com (Michael Condon); Date: Wed, 7 Dec 2005 07:22:22 -0800 (PST); Bruce, and all, Posposing that certificates be used for new categories where no sponsor exists at present is meant as a starting point. Certificates would be a default award, and as plaque sponsors a; /archives//html/SECC/2005-12/msg00081.html (9,398 bytes)
348. [SECC] GQP changes (score: 64): Author: mrcne4s at yahoo.com (Michael Condon); Date: Wed, 7 Dec 2005 07:31:35 -0800 (PST); A bit more... I do think that CW only QRP recognitions are really good goals, as Bruce notes. Thanks Bruce.. Mike Personally, I think going with SSB, CW, and Mixed categories WILL attract more partic; /archives//html/SECC/2005-12/msg00083.html (8,775 bytes)
349. [SECC] Telnet connection?? (score: 64): Author: mrcne4s at yahoo.com (Michael Condon); Date: Fri, 9 Dec 2005 12:36:19 -0800 (PST); Folks, Which telnet connection should I use for spots for the 10M test? I am going to try N1MM for the first time, and early tests using "AB5K" worked OK but I wondered what others might suggest. Mik; /archives//html/SECC/2005-12/msg00096.html (6,822 bytes)
350. [SECC] NE4S ARRL 10M (score: 64): Author: mrcne4s at yahoo.com (Michael Condon); Date: Mon, 12 Dec 2005 05:37:04 -0800 (PST); Low prop allowed a lot of personal time.... but I missed most of Sunday afternoon. Thanks for spots from several SECC folks, I noticed calls after each of them. I promise to do spots next time. With; /archives//html/SECC/2005-12/msg00115.html (7,526 bytes)
351. [SECC] K4EA ARRL 10M - Class corretion (score: 64): Author: mrcne4s at yahoo.com (Michael Condon); Date: Tue, 13 Dec 2005 05:21:27 -0800 (PST); Neal, I had a bounce too. I chose "Single Op Assisted" in my logger, and it bounced. "Multi-one" resub went OK. The logger N1MM put up all the choices, even some not recognized in this contest. Congr; /archives//html/SECC/2005-12/msg00124.html (7,629 bytes)
352. [SECC] GQP Rules (score: 64): Author: mrcne4s at yahoo.com (Michael Condon); Date: Sat, 17 Dec 2005 06:51:35 -0800 (PST); Hi, I have not heard much more on the rules discussion, so here is an attempt to wrap it up. Schedule: There were a couple of comments on the suggestion to change, but on balance there was no big rea; /archives//html/SECC/2005-12/msg00141.html (9,582 bytes)
353. [SECC] GQP Rules Proposal (score: 64): Author: mrcne4s at yahoo.com (Michael Condon); Date: Sun, 18 Dec 2005 12:41:59 -0800 (PST); OK, I have made the proposal(s). Lets have a second, and let the club officers conduct the vote from there... Mike, NE4S Please use ne4s at iham.us as my address. Be well, Thanks ____________________; /archives//html/SECC/2005-12/msg00146.html (6,485 bytes)
354. [SECC] GQP rules discussions (score: 64): Author: mrcne4s at yahoo.com (Michael Condon); Date: Sat, 26 Nov 2005 04:30:52 -0800 (PST); Hi, This seems a good time to open a discussion on GQP rule changes for next year. Tommy suggested it earlier, so I asked he and Hal to help work up a proposed set of rules from my collection of note; /archives//html/SECC/2005-11/msg00266.html (7,406 bytes)
355. [SECC] GQP rules updated on web site (score: 64): Author: mrcne4s at yahoo.com (Michael Condon); Date: Sun, 27 Nov 2005 08:13:12 -0800 (PST); Sorry Ed, The updated rules are too big to post here, even as inline text. So, Ed and all, please hit the web site, to read, copy, paste, and print as needed. I don't see much feedback yet, so the fi; /archives//html/SECC/2005-11/msg00268.html (6,905 bytes)
356. [SECC] GQP rules updated on web site (score: 64): Author: mrcne4s at yahoo.com (Michael Condon); Date: Mon, 28 Nov 2005 05:59:57 -0800 (PST); Thanks Lee... DUH,,, MIke Uh, one of the biggest contests of the year is going on this weekend. -- Lee Hiers, AA4GA "Have Dobro Will Travel" _______________________________________________ SECC maili; /archives//html/SECC/2005-11/msg00281.html (7,184 bytes)
357. [SECC] N1MM Software (score: 64): Author: mrcne4s at yahoo.com (Michael Condon); Date: Mon, 28 Nov 2005 14:37:30 -0800 (PST); DBs are like programming languages... they all have their place. And everyone has their favorite... I do like Access, and use it a lot... it probably is not the best, but the price is right (other th; /archives//html/SECC/2005-11/msg00297.html (9,020 bytes)
358. [SECC] TQP and Salmon run From NE4S (score: 64): Author: mrcne4s at yahoo.com (Michael Condon); Date: Tue, 20 Sep 2005 14:28:46 -0700 (PDT); Score for Tenn QP was 1100, PH, SOHP from Colorado. Score for Salmon run was 2944 PH, SOHP, Colorado. Time for the salmon run was 3 1/2 hours. I will hit this one much harder next year. SECC on both; /archives//html/SECC/2005-09/msg00088.html (6,817 bytes)
359. [SECC] GQP Scores (score: 64): Author: mrcne4s at yahoo.com (Michael Condon); Date: Mon, 1 Aug 2005 06:57:03 -0700 (PDT); Gang, I have finished the scoring of GQP. I tried to post them here late last week but I had attached a file... not allowed on the reflector I think. And with the attachement removed it was still ove; /archives//html/SECC/2005-08/msg00000.html (6,885 bytes)
360. [SECC] GQP Check Scores on Web Site (score: 64): Author: mrcne4s at yahoo.com (Michael Condon); Date: Tue, 2 Aug 2005 07:44:35 -0700 (PDT); At the suggestion of Jeff, KU8E, I have made the scores available for checking on the GQP web site. I have changed the "Logs Received" page to be a full list "by Score" for checking. Any problems can; /archives//html/SECC/2005-08/msg00009.html (8,532 bytes)

Current List: 341 - 360
Page: [1] [2] [3] [4] [5] [6] [7] [8] [9] [10] [11] [12] [13] [14] [15] [16] [17] [18] [19] [20]