- 1. [SECC] 160m Contest (score: 1)
- Author: kmcc@mindspring.com (Kent McCorkle)
- Date: Sat, 7 Dec 2002 14:24:26 -0500
- I don't have a 160m antenna up, so I wasn't really planning on getting in the contest, but after listening to the band last night when I got home from work, I just had to give it a try. I tried the t
- /archives//html/SECC/2002-12/msg00024.html (6,824 bytes)
- 2. [SECC] NAQP CW Summary (score: 1)
- Author: kmcc@mindspring.com (Kent McCorkle)
- Date: Sun, 4 Aug 2002 14:41:41 -0400
- I was only able to put in about 5 hours. I guess there's no sense talking about conditions since everyone knows how bad they were. Band Contacts Mults Score -- -- -- -- 3.5 7 3 21 7 100 32 3200 14 69
- /archives//html/SECC/2002-08/msg00069.html (6,348 bytes)
- 3. NAQP Team #3 (score: 1)
- Author: kmcc@mindspring.com (Kent McCorkle)
- Date: Sun, 13 Jan 2002 07:31:54 -0500
- I actually did far more than I anticipated. (Changes in other family member's schedules resulted in more free time for me - a rare incident.) AE4Y NAQPCW Score Summary Sheet Band Contacts Mults Score
- /archives//html/SECC/2002-01/msg00079.html (6,659 bytes)
- 4. NAQP Results (score: 1)
- Author: kmcc@mindspring.com (Kent McCorkle)
- Date: Sun, 5 Aug 2001 11:32:16 -0400
- I ended up putting in more time than I originally thought I'd be able too. I guess that's a good thing. 10 meters didn't offer much here. I don't really have a 80 meter antenna up presently, but thro
- /archives//html/SECC/2001-08/msg00040.html (6,547 bytes)
This search system is powered by
Namazu