Mail Archive Search: <+from:k4sb@mindspring.com>

Results:

References: [ +from:k4sb@mindspring.com: 151 ]

Total 151 documents matching your query.

141. [SECC] Comments requested. (score: 1): Author: k4sb@mindspring.com (Ed Sleight); Date: Sat, 10 Jun 2000 04:06:48 +0000; Have to disagree with Bill here. The log checking process has absolutely nothing to do with uniques. If a guy makes a few contacts, but doesn't send in a log, there's not much you can do. If the call; /archives//html/SECC/2000-06/msg00026.html (9,787 bytes)
142. [SECC] Comments requested. (score: 1): Author: k4sb@mindspring.com (Ed Sleight); Date: Mon, 12 Jun 2000 17:46:04 +0000; I think Bill and I are on the same track, just saying it differently. But, again, any WEB page which will display your call will also give your Lat/Long. I'm certainly not that enthusiastic about gri; /archives//html/SECC/2000-06/msg00032.html (8,860 bytes)
143. [SECC] Possible club call (score: 1): Author: k4sb@mindspring.com (Ed Sleight); Date: Fri, 16 Jun 2000 19:51:30 +0000; It still applies, although it is expressed as family, not as a specific individual. Lokk at the FAQs on Vanity calls and it mentions it. BTW, I'm not real sure that in this case, you have to wait the; /archives//html/SECC/2000-06/msg00047.html (8,055 bytes)
144. [SECC] Possible club call (score: 1): Author: k4sb@mindspring.com (Edward W. Sleight); Date: Wed, 28 Jun 2000 03:03:16 +0000; Fellows, I have worked at this since the Vanity program opened. Think I have the bookmarks on the office computer and will see if I can't quote chapter and verse. However, ANY thought that the proces; /archives//html/SECC/2000-06/msg00064.html (7,946 bytes)
145. [SECC] Possible club call (score: 1): Author: k4sb@mindspring.com (Ed Sleight); Date: Wed, 28 Jun 2000 03:31:30 +0000; I thought I made it absolutely clear that the procedure has changed. I furthermore have no doubt at all that the reason for the change was to allow the FCC to favor those they wished. My only thought; /archives//html/SECC/2000-06/msg00067.html (7,996 bytes)
146. [SECC] club call (score: 1): Author: k4sb@mindspring.com (Ed Sleight); Date: Wed, 28 Jun 2000 14:02:58 +0000; OK, apparently the format has changed slightly, but to put most of the "guesses as to what, when and why" to bed for good, check out http://www.carrol-usa.com/vanity/ You will note that there are NO; /archives//html/SECC/2000-06/msg00071.html (7,647 bytes)
147. [SECC] club call (score: 1): Author: k4sb@mindspring.com (Ed Sleight); Date: Wed, 28 Jun 2000 20:01:54 +0000; Whoops, try this one...left off an "L" http://www.carroll-usa.com/vanity Hell to get old. 73 Ed -- FAQ on WWW: http://www.contesting.com/seccfaq.html Submissions: secc@contesting.com Administrative r; /archives//html/SECC/2000-06/msg00075.html (7,394 bytes)
148. [SECC] club call (score: 1): Author: k4sb@mindspring.com (Ed Sleight); Date: Wed, 28 Jun 2000 20:10:37 +0000; Well, the FCC is dead wrong on this one. An existing club name may be changed by an amendment of the Constitution and By Laws of the club. BOTH must be submitted to the FCC. I've gone through this be; /archives//html/SECC/2000-06/msg00076.html (7,545 bytes)
149. [SECC] Aluminum Tubing Source ? (score: 1): Author: k4sb@mindspring.com (K4SB); Date: Fri, 05 May 2000 18:12:32 +0000; Lowe's sells 8 foot pieces of 6061T6 from about 5/8" to 1" 73 Ed -- FAQ on WWW: http://www.contesting.com/seccfaq.html Submissions: secc@contesting.com Administrative requests: secc-REQUEST@contestin; /archives//html/SECC/2000-05/msg00018.html (6,538 bytes)
150. [SECC] SECC meeting at Atlanta Hamfest? (score: 1): Author: k4sb@mindspring.com (Ed Sleight); Date: Wed, 31 May 2000 03:53:50 +0000; If not, would be a fine idea! 73 Ed -- FAQ on WWW: http://www.contesting.com/seccfaq.html Submissions: secc@contesting.com Administrative requests: secc-REQUEST@contesting.com Problems: owner-secc@co; /archives//html/SECC/2000-05/msg00068.html (7,185 bytes)
151. [SECC] Re: [CAC-I:237] "Sprint within the SS" (score: 1): Author: k4sb@mindspring.com (K4SB); Date: Fri, 21 Apr 2000 03:41:24 +0100; I vote for option B. No changes 73 Ed -- FAQ on WWW: http://www.contesting.com/seccfaq.html Submissions: secc@contesting.com Administrative requests: secc-REQUEST@contesting.com Problems: owner-secc@; /archives//html/SECC/2000-04/msg00026.html (6,762 bytes)

Current List: 141 - 151
Page: [1] [2] [3] [4] [5] [6] [7] [8]