- 21. [SECC] Quiet (score: 1)
- Author: hamcat@directvinternet.com (K4SB)
- Date: Sat, 19 Oct 2002 17:39:03 +0000
- There was quite a long discussion on the merits of the 2 on the towertalk reflector about a year ago. The MFJ won hands down, being notably better then the Autek in filtering out other strong RF sour
- /archives//html/SECC/2002-10/msg00039.html (7,280 bytes)
- 22. [SECC] Fw: Re: [Towertalk] Refurb Old Tower? (score: 1)
- Author: hamcat@directvinternet.com (K4SB)
- Date: Mon, 21 Oct 2002 02:53:37 +0000
- There are a couple of ways to deal with that slit. If it's close to the bottom of a section, bury it in concrete, but first make sure all 3 legs are clear of dirt, ect. Slits such as these are usual
- /archives//html/SECC/2002-10/msg00043.html (7,615 bytes)
- 23. [SECC] GQP Rules (score: 1)
- Author: hamcat@directvinternet.com (K4SB)
- Date: Wed, 23 Oct 2002 14:57:55 +0000
- Agree 100%. In fact, just change the rule to comply with the county hunters rules. Basically, a county line can only be run from 2 counties at a time, and "wet" lines, where a stream or river is the
- /archives//html/SECC/2002-10/msg00068.html (7,001 bytes)
- 24. [SECC] GQP Rules (score: 1)
- Author: hamcat@directvinternet.com (K4SB)
- Date: Wed, 23 Oct 2002 15:01:04 +0000
- Lee has a good point, the obvious change which would correct it is double QSO pts for county lines. And those guys on the sailboat? Work em if you want, but the cards are worthless for any CH award.
- /archives//html/SECC/2002-10/msg00070.html (6,686 bytes)
- 25. [SECC] county line QSOs in Georgia QSO Party (score: 1)
- Author: hamcat@directvinternet.com (K4SB)
- Date: Fri, 25 Oct 2002 02:32:05 +0000
- They do, they simply log the station twice, once for each country. Since eash occurs at the same time, the QSL card will note just one QSO, with something like C/L Monroe/Madison I really don't under
- /archives//html/SECC/2002-10/msg00095.html (7,500 bytes)
- 26. [SECC] Club scores for CQ WW and CQ 160 (score: 1)
- Author: hamcat@directvinternet.com (K4SB)
- Date: Sat, 26 Oct 2002 02:19:43 +0000
- I thought that was a one time deal...?? 73 ed
- /archives//html/SECC/2002-10/msg00103.html (6,566 bytes)
- 27. [SECC] Re: Delivery Status Notification (score: 1)
- Author: hamcat@directvinternet.com (K4SB)
- Date: Thu, 04 Jul 2002 02:29:09 +0000
- OK John, fess up...what did you do to the IP to make it not like you. 73 ed
- /archives//html/SECC/2002-07/msg00008.html (6,436 bytes)
- 28. [SECC] Re: Delivery Status Notification (score: 1)
- Author: hamcat@directvinternet.com (K4SB)
- Date: Thu, 04 Jul 2002 03:25:18 +0000
-
- /archives//html/SECC/2002-07/msg00009.html (6,615 bytes)
- 29. [SECC] Club Call (score: 1)
- Author: hamcat@directvinternet.com (K4SB)
- Date: Thu, 11 Jul 2002 17:29:56 +0000
- I believe this has been mentioned before, but I again suggest the SECC obtain a vanity call. I have researched the FCC database, and other URLs, and have determined that numerous calls are available
- /archives//html/SECC/2002-07/msg00021.html (7,078 bytes)
- 30. [SECC] Re: Welcome back (score: 1)
- Author: hamcat@directvinternet.com (K4SB)
- Date: Tue, 18 Jun 2002 15:00:32 +0000
- OK guys, looks like I have made it back to subscriber status. My new email is hamcat@directvinternet.com ( and if you're wondering, Direct TV ( notice only one "t" in the email address ) provides a f
- /archives//html/SECC/2002-06/msg00056.html (6,391 bytes)
- 31. [SECC] Re: (score: 1)
- Author: hamcat@directvinternet.com (K4SB)
- Date: Tue, 18 Jun 2002 00:56:49 +0000
- Finally got my email fixed. New address for K4SB is: hamcat@directvinternet.com No cracks. 73 Ed
- /archives//html/SECC/2002-06/msg00065.html (5,906 bytes)
- 32. [SECC] SS Phone 2001 (score: 1)
- Author: hamcat@directvinternet.com (K4SB)
- Date: Thu, 20 Jun 2002 18:13:50 +0000
- I too hope Bridget will reconsider. I like the CW more than the phone, but got zapped also last year. Over 90% of the zaps ( don't even think of asking )were in the number in the call, leading me to
- /archives//html/SECC/2002-06/msg00075.html (9,240 bytes)
- 33. [SECC] SS Phone 2001 (score: 1)
- Author: hamcat@directvinternet.com (K4SB)
- Date: Fri, 21 Jun 2002 14:22:51 +0000
- No, that is not what I said. The database would include the call. I also mentioned the possibility of adding the check, Prec, and State. Obviously, the check and Prec are not reliable enough to be in
- /archives//html/SECC/2002-06/msg00087.html (7,925 bytes)
- 34. [SECC] Harmonic (score: 1)
- Author: hamcat@directvinternet.com (K4SB)
- Date: Tue, 25 Jun 2002 16:34:16 +0000
- I must point out that the father's presense is mandatory only at the laying of the keel, and completely unneccessary at the launch. So, what's this "we" stuff? Ed
- /archives//html/SECC/2002-06/msg00121.html (7,792 bytes)
- 35. [SECC] Need advice (score: 1)
- Author: hamcat@directvinternet.com (K4SB)
- Date: Sat, 29 Jun 2002 13:33:35 +0000
- I do have the report, and find that it just contains too many inconsistancies. Mostly in the path and heights used. I would not recommend it. 73 Ed
- /archives//html/SECC/2002-06/msg00132.html (6,847 bytes)
This search system is powered by
Namazu