Mail Archive Search: <+from:aldermant at alltel.net>

Results:

References: [ +from:aldermant: 359 ] [ at (Too many documents hit. Ignored) ] [ alltel.net: 366 ]

Total 194 documents matching your query.

141. [SECC] FOC Bill Windle (score: 99): Author: aldermant at alltel.net (Tommy); Date: Wed, 19 Oct 2005 11:51:24 -0400; Worked : 251 Members: 194 Tom - W4BQF FOC #1825; /archives//html/SECC/2005-10/msg00100.html (5,924 bytes)
142. [SECC] SS CW & SSB (score: 99): Author: aldermant at alltel.net (Tommy); Date: Thu, 20 Oct 2005 18:53:38 -0400; I intend to do the best I can on CW with just the one 80m dipole I have. If I can find my radio manual to read up on how to get it to operate SSB, I will give it a shot...for the first time EVER! Omn; /archives//html/SECC/2005-10/msg00112.html (6,685 bytes)
143. [SECC] Band Conditions (score: 99): Author: aldermant at alltel.net (Tommy); Date: Wed, 07 Sep 2005 18:16:05 -0400; In case you turn your radio on and hear nothing, your radio is not broken and your antenna's are probably still up! Right now we are under black out solar storm condition R4, with R5 being the most s; /archives//html/SECC/2005-09/msg00026.html (6,535 bytes)
144. [SECC] Solar flare (score: 99): Author: aldermant at alltel.net (Tommy); Date: Thu, 08 Sep 2005 07:17:15 -0400; Yesterday when I posted the info on the large solar flare, both 20m and 40m were completely dead, leading to my assumption that we had a complete radio blackout. However since signals, especially on; /archives//html/SECC/2005-09/msg00027.html (6,370 bytes)
145. [SECC] Alabama QSO Party (score: 99): Author: aldermant at alltel.net (Tommy); Date: Fri, 23 Sep 2005 21:31:31 -0400; Will be looking for ya Dan... Tom - W4BQF Eastern surburds of Cecil, Ga.; /archives//html/SECC/2005-09/msg00097.html (7,278 bytes)
146. [SECC] GQP Final Scores on Web (score: 99): Author: aldermant at alltel.net (Tommy); Date: Mon, 15 Aug 2005 22:55:29 -0400; Mike, Congrats. That was very well done. I think it is very important to have contest scores published as soon as possible so everyone can find out how they faired. I'm sure you went through a lot of; /archives//html/SECC/2005-08/msg00056.html (7,894 bytes)
147. [SECC] Moon Phase & ARRL dx test & Stuff (score: 99): Author: aldermant at alltel.net (Tommy); Date: Thu, 23 Jun 2005 19:47:46 -0400; Due to the fact that N4GG and KU8E (and others) did a magnificent job at PJ4R and Rich commandeered K4BAI for this years ARRL DX contest, the phase of the moon was correct and I ate all my grits. Acc; /archives//html/SECC/2005-06/msg00076.html (6,886 bytes)
148. [SECC] NEQP (score: 99): Author: aldermant at alltel.net (Tommy); Date: Fri, 6 May 2005 21:09:59 -0400; Just in case anyone in the SECC is using YPlog by VE6YP, I have made workable .rul and .cty files that is fully functional for this weekend's New England QSO Party. The Italian ARI DX contest is also; /archives//html/SECC/2005-05/msg00029.html (6,192 bytes)
149. [SECC] CA QP Certificate and Network Analyzer (score: 99): Author: aldermant at alltel.net (Tommy); Date: Fri, 6 May 2005 21:35:24 -0400; Even though I probably placed about 9,873,321st place, I received a 'High Achievement In Georgia' award from the NCCC. Very nice looking wall paper and as Bill say's, something like this would encour; /archives//html/SECC/2005-05/msg00030.html (8,030 bytes)
150. [SECC] NEQP (score: 99): Author: aldermant at alltel.net (Tommy); Date: Sun, 8 May 2005 22:34:25 -0400; Fun contest, but not enough time to do much good! SCORE = 6650 POINTS = 190 MULTIPLIERS = 35 OP TIME = 6 hrs BAND QSO'S DUPS POINTS MULTIPLIERS SCORE -- -- -- -- -- -- 160 0 0 0 0 0 80 24 0 48 1 48 4; /archives//html/SECC/2005-05/msg00037.html (6,327 bytes)
151. [SECC] WPX (score: 99): Author: aldermant at alltel.net (Tommy); Date: Sun, 29 May 2005 21:31:36 -0400; Call: W4BQF Operator: W4BQF Class: SOAB-HP QTH: eastern suburbs of Cecil Operating Time: 15 hrs Omni 6 Plus/Titan 3/80 mtr Dipole Score: 1,307,136 Points: 2533 Multi: 512 QSO's: 1011 What sunspot min; /archives//html/SECC/2005-05/msg00095.html (6,227 bytes)
152. [SECC] KO4RR Plaque (score: 99): Author: aldermant at alltel.net (Tommy); Date: Fri, 1 Apr 2005 12:33:31 -0500; Why not just make the GQP for rovers only? Maybe the SECC could come up with 56 categories for rovers by doing that? Tommy W4BQF Maybe have 3 categories for rovers : 1) S/O - does both driving operat; /archives//html/SECC/2005-04/msg00005.html (10,877 bytes)
153. [SECC] [SEDXC] Memorial Service for K4GA (score: 99): Author: aldermant at alltel.net (Tommy); Date: Tue, 5 Apr 2005 12:47:20 -0400; What about the possibility that a native Georgian would like to be able to get the K4GA call sign? Tommy W4BQF -- Well, I need to check it out, but I'm afraid that I have egg on my face. I just recei; /archives//html/SECC/2005-04/msg00042.html (8,842 bytes)
154. [SECC] [SEDXC] K4GA (score: 99): Author: aldermant at alltel.net (Tommy); Date: Tue, 5 Apr 2005 16:10:56 -0400; Thanks. That is perhaps the most frank discussion on the call vanity system I've ever read! After having lived in northern Virginia for 35 years, it certainly rings a bell! Tommy W4BQF --Original Mes; /archives//html/SECC/2005-04/msg00046.html (9,303 bytes)
155. [SECC] GQP (score: 99): Author: aldermant at alltel.net (Tommy); Date: Tue, 12 Apr 2005 08:27:44 -0400; May as well throw my 2 cents into the rules discussion. I didn't participate in the GQP this year, partly because I had company and partly because there is no category in which I can participate. I d; /archives//html/SECC/2005-04/msg00134.html (7,983 bytes)
156. [SECC] W4AN Club Call (was: RE: Field Day and W4AN) (score: 99): Author: aldermant at alltel.net (Tommy); Date: Wed, 20 Apr 2005 09:07:32 -0400; I agree with the 'first come, first serve' issuance of W4AN, however I would suggest a time limitation for requesting it. Such as one can only request the call say, 30 or 45 days before the specific; /archives//html/SECC/2005-04/msg00256.html (13,856 bytes)
157. [SECC] W4AN (score: 99): Author: aldermant at alltel.net (Tommy); Date: Wed, 20 Apr 2005 17:54:59 -0400; Larry, Very interesting post, with merits. However, please allow me to disagree with just one point you made, and that is about this being a 'controversy'. As I understand it, the reflector is the of; /archives//html/SECC/2005-04/msg00275.html (10,838 bytes)
158. [SECC] New projects (score: 99): Author: aldermant at alltel.net (Tommy); Date: Sun, 24 Apr 2005 15:30:00 -0400; I have made a 2 element Extended Double Zepp for 20m, which on EZNEC shows 14.7dB forward gain and 20 dB F/B, if mounted a half wave high. Have one built and was up in the trees, but wind + trees = 1; /archives//html/SECC/2005-04/msg00289.html (7,700 bytes)
159. [SECC] OK, what did you guys do? (score: 99): Author: aldermant at alltel.net (Tommy); Date: Sun, 24 Apr 2005 21:36:40 -0400; Bill, This is not a 'personal' shot, but having read all of the SECC post over the past three weeks or longer, I think this one is the most mis-guided post I've read. Since the SECC use's the reflect; /archives//html/SECC/2005-04/msg00294.html (7,992 bytes)
160. [SECC] fcc uses contest logs for evidence (score: 99): Author: aldermant at alltel.net (Tommy); Date: Thu, 28 Apr 2005 17:07:23 -0400; I've been trying to not say anything about this thread, but I just can't control my fingers. :>))) You know, we complain when the FCC does no regulation, now are we complaining because they are tryin; /archives//html/SECC/2005-04/msg00311.html (9,358 bytes)

Current List: 141 - 160
Page: [1] [2] [3] [4] [5] [6] [7] [8] [9] [10]