Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[SD\-User\]\s+Cut\s+numbers\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[SD\-User\]\s+Cut\s+numbers\s*$/: 4 ]

Total 4 documents matching your query.

1. [SD-User] Cut numbers (score: 1): Author: John Scott <scotts@sandycove-ns.ca>; Date: Fri, 19 Dec 2014 13:28:27 -0400; Cut numbers except for N in place of 9 and perhaps o in place of zero should be BANNED in all contests. Particularly by ops running 35+ wpm. Just my 5 cents worth. (No pennies in Canada any more)! Jo; /archives//html/SD-User/2014-12/msg00010.html (6,383 bytes)
2. Re: [SD-User] Cut numbers (score: 1): Author: Paul Bigwood <g3wyw@btinternet.com>; Date: Fri, 19 Dec 2014 22:39:17 +0000; Hi John, I agree on the N for 9 in the 599 field ( where it is required/ sent) but not in the serial number field. Not sure about the 'o' in place of '0'. What about zero? It seems that 'T' for the l; /archives//html/SD-User/2014-12/msg00011.html (7,900 bytes)
3. Re: [SD-User] Cut numbers (score: 1): Author: Paul O'Kane <pokane@ei5di.com>; Date: Fri, 19 Dec 2014 23:38:42 +0000; I'd like to be able to send TT1 for the first QSO and TT2 for the 2nd, etc up to TT9 then it goes to T10 and T11 etc but I dont think SD supports that as far as I can see. That is indeed the way SD; /archives//html/SD-User/2014-12/msg00012.html (8,157 bytes)
4. Re: [SD-User] Cut numbers (score: 1): Author: "Dave Sergeant" <dave@davesergeant.com>; Date: Sat, 20 Dec 2014 01:44:05 -0500; Sending just EU5 for the UK seems accepted and never gets repeat requests. Being a luddite and sending everything manually, 5NN, TT1 etc seems universally accepted. Other cut numbers are a pain and n; /archives//html/SD-User/2014-12/msg00013.html (7,380 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 4
Page: [1]