Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[RTTY\]\s+which\s+MMTTY\s+profile\s+is\s+best\s+for\s+over\s+the\s+pole\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[RTTY\]\s+which\s+MMTTY\s+profile\s+is\s+best\s+for\s+over\s+the\s+pole\s*$/: 2 ]

Total 2 documents matching your query.

1. [RTTY] which MMTTY profile is best for over the pole (score: 1): Author: Bill <w9ol@billnjudy.com>; Date: Sat, 05 Nov 2011 08:59:28 -0500; VK9CX is almost exactly over the poles for me. Long path or short. Here in Chicago, it's usually short path in morning, long path in our evenings. It seemed to me, that the MMTTY 'Fluttered signal (F; /archives//html/RTTY/2011-11/msg00011.html (7,820 bytes)
2. Re: [RTTY] which MMTTY profile is best for over the pole (score: 1): Author: "Don Hill AA5AU" <aa5au@bellsouth.net>; Date: Sat, 5 Nov 2011 09:14:51 -0500; I used Fluttered signals (FIR) when working VK9CX on 20 RTTY this morning. It worked well on the fluttery signal. I normally leave it on this profile most of the time and occasionally use the AA6YQ p; /archives//html/RTTY/2011-11/msg00012.html (8,642 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 2
Page: [1]