Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[RTTY\]\s+rckskimmer\,\s+still\s+worth\s+setting\s+up\?\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[RTTY\]\s+rckskimmer\,\s+still\s+worth\s+setting\s+up\?\s*$/: 3 ]

Total 3 documents matching your query.

1. [RTTY] rckskimmer, still worth setting up? (score: 1): Author: Jurgen Geldhof <list@on5mf.be>; Date: Sun, 17 Apr 2016 10:52:42 +0200; Hi, the nearest station skimming for the digital modes is some 600km away from here. So I was thinking of setting up a modest skimmer station for the digital modes here locally. I still have some que; /archives//html/RTTY/2016-04/msg00162.html (7,269 bytes)
2. Re: [RTTY] rckskimmer, still worth setting up? (score: 1): Author: "Kermit $aka Ken$ via RTTY" <rtty@contesting.com>; Date: Sun, 17 Apr 2016 11:38:51 -0400; Hi Jurgen, I use the v3.2 RCKskimmer in RTTY contests. I was going to upgrade to the new VE3NEA RTTY skimmer server, but the Quicksilver QS1R is no longer manufactured and I decided to wait for its r; /archives//html/RTTY/2016-04/msg00163.html (10,250 bytes)
3. Re: [RTTY] rckskimmer, still worth setting up? (score: 1): Author: iw1ayd - Salvatore Irato <iw1ayd@gmail.com>; Date: Sun, 17 Apr 2016 18:27:06 +0200; Hi Jurgen. The answers are: *+"yes, it is worth to do some personal testing with standard radio and the DL4RCK RTTY skimmer" (That's why it's made for.) * "no, the DL4RCK RTTY skimmer seemed to me no; /archives//html/RTTY/2016-04/msg00164.html (9,068 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 3
Page: [1]