Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[RTTY\]\s+jt\-65\s+and\s+jt\-9\s+frequency\s+usage\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[RTTY\]\s+jt\-65\s+and\s+jt\-9\s+frequency\s+usage\s*$/: 12 ]

Total 12 documents matching your query.

1. [RTTY] jt-65 and jt-9 frequency usage (score: 1): Author: wo4r_jeff@yahoo.com; Date: Fri, 4 Oct 2013 07:02:29 -0700 (PDT); One area we need to stay clear of is the 4 khz used by wsjt-x. On 20 meters that is 14.076 - 14.078 for jt-65 and 14.078 - 14080 for jt-9. The following list the jt-65 frequencies and the jt-9 freque; /archives//html/RTTY/2013-10/msg00109.html (7,337 bytes)
2. Re: [RTTY] jt-65 and jt-9 frequency usage (score: 1): Author: "Joe Subich, W4TV" <lists@subich.com>; Date: Fri, 04 Oct 2013 10:43:32 -0400; Absolutely! This past weekend the level of RTTY QRM to JT65 and JT9 frequencies was extreme. Also note that transceivers generally display the *MARK* frequency in RTTY mode. Since RTTY "shifts down"; /archives//html/RTTY/2013-10/msg00110.html (7,657 bytes)
3. Re: [RTTY] jt-65 and jt-9 frequency usage (score: 1): Author: Al Kozakiewicz <akozak@hourglass.com>; Date: Fri, 4 Oct 2013 11:03:29 -0400; Out of curiousity, do folks think there any real benefit score-wise in operating cheek to jowl between .080 and .100? Psychologically I believe it is probably so, since I assume all hams are OCD wrac; /archives//html/RTTY/2013-10/msg00111.html (9,816 bytes)
4. Re: [RTTY] jt-65 and jt-9 frequency usage (score: 1): Author: Dave Greig <daven3buo@att.net>; Date: Fri, 4 Oct 2013 10:07:20 -0500; Jeff, Where I run into an issue is on 17 meters and 12 meters. No real convention is follower for JT65 and RTTY. Thank You! Dave Greig N3BUO Phone: (682) 422-6667 Twitter: @N3BUO Facebook: https://ww; /archives//html/RTTY/2013-10/msg00112.html (7,973 bytes)
5. Re: [RTTY] jt-65 and jt-9 frequency usage (score: 1): Author: Bill Turner <dezrat1242@yahoo.com>; Date: Fri, 04 Oct 2013 09:40:48 -0700; ORIGINAL MESSAGE: (may be snipped) REPLY: Jeff makes a good point. The non-RTTY guys are pretty good at staying below 14080 and I think it would be good of us RTTY'ers to stay above that. In the USA,; /archives//html/RTTY/2013-10/msg00113.html (8,556 bytes)
6. Re: [RTTY] jt-65 and jt-9 frequency usage (score: 1): Author: "Shoppa, Tim" <tshoppa@wmata.com>; Date: Fri, 4 Oct 2013 16:43:03 +0000; I had much more success running well outside the 080 to 100kc windows this past weekend, where things were much thinner, than in the "prime" area between 080 and 100. Even if I was holding a frequen; /archives//html/RTTY/2013-10/msg00114.html (8,667 bytes)
7. Re: [RTTY] jt-65 and jt-9 frequency usage (score: 1): Author: Jay WS7I <ws7ik7tj@gmail.com>; Date: Fri, 04 Oct 2013 09:48:44 -0700; Guess we should stay off all of these as well. http://www.bandplans.com/index.php?band=20 There are many interests in the digital community and we should respect them all. ___________________________; /archives//html/RTTY/2013-10/msg00116.html (7,944 bytes)
8. Re: [RTTY] jt-65 and jt-9 frequency usage (score: 1): Author: Robert Chudek - K0RC <k0rc@citlink.net>; Date: Fri, 04 Oct 2013 12:00:18 -0500; Thanks Jay! I see my frequency was not on that list so I have added it using the form at the bottom of the page. 73 de Bob - KØRC in MN -- http://www.bandplans.com/index.php?band=20 There are many in; /archives//html/RTTY/2013-10/msg00118.html (9,057 bytes)
9. Re: [RTTY] jt-65 and jt-9 frequency usage (score: 1): Author: iw1ayd - Salvatore Irato <iw1ayd@gmail.com>; Date: Fri, 04 Oct 2013 19:35:29 +0200; Silly me, scared me, but it is anytime the same modes battle - time after time. I am not going to be loved by anyone, but too much is too much. That's not a question of politely or not politely pursu; /archives//html/RTTY/2013-10/msg00119.html (11,082 bytes)
10. Re: [RTTY] jt-65 and jt-9 frequency usage (score: 1): Author: Jeff Stai <wk6i.jeff@gmail.com>; Date: Fri, 4 Oct 2013 11:08:16 -0700; Looks like it needs correcting on 80m. Can't do US RTTY above 3600 anymore. And JA is 3520-3530 (not 3525) per http://jarts.jp/rules2013.html. - jeff wk6i -- Jeff Stai ~ wk6i.jeff@gmail.com Twisted O; /archives//html/RTTY/2013-10/msg00120.html (9,354 bytes)
11. Re: [RTTY] jt-65 and jt-9 frequency usage (score: 1): Author: Stanley Zawrotny <k4sbz.stan@gmail.com>; Date: Fri, 4 Oct 2013 23:00:23 -0400; I hope you weren't contesting on those WARC bands? Stan, K4SBZ Sent from my iPad _______________________________________________ RTTY mailing list RTTY@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mail; /archives//html/RTTY/2013-10/msg00124.html (9,525 bytes)
12. Re: [RTTY] jt-65 and jt-9 frequency usage (score: 1): Author: Stanley Zawrotny <k4sbz.stan@gmail.com>; Date: Sat, 5 Oct 2013 00:11:11 -0400; The discussion was about avoiding jt-65 & jt-9 DURING CONTESTS, so I thought the comment was appropriate because those are non-contest bands. Sorry to get your dander up, John. Stan, K4SBZ Sent from; /archives//html/RTTY/2013-10/msg00125.html (10,294 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 12
Page: [1]