- 1. [RTTY] Zone 4 (score: 1)
- Author: "William D.Storer" <wstorer@cinci.rr.com>
- Date: Mon, 27 Sep 2004 08:55:30 -0400
- Just a note about W4 RTTY contacts during the CQWW RTTY Contest. Noticed several of KY and TN callsigns sending zone 5 during the contest while others were sending the proper zone 4. Should be zone 4
- /archives//html/RTTY/2004-09/msg00212.html (7,166 bytes)
- 2. Re: [RTTY] Zone 4 (score: 1)
- Author: Jim Reisert AD1C <jjreisert@alum.mit.edu>
- Date: Mon, 27 Sep 2004 09:13:54 -0400
- At 08:55 AM 9/27/2004, William D.Storer wrote: Noticed several of KY and TN callsigns sending zone 5 during the contest while others were sending the proper zone 4. Should be zone 4 according to CQ's
- /archives//html/RTTY/2004-09/msg00214.html (7,948 bytes)
- 3. Re: [RTTY] Zone 4 (score: 1)
- Author: W0YR@aol.com
- Date: Mon, 27 Sep 2004 10:52:40 EDT
- Yes, I noticed this. This is just ONE MORE REASON that in all contests where zone or call area matters, STATIONS SHOULD BE REQUIRED TO SEND A CALLSIGN THAT REFLECTS THEIR ACTUAL LOCATION. But this is
- /archives//html/RTTY/2004-09/msg00221.html (6,584 bytes)
- 4. Re: [RTTY] Zone 4 (score: 1)
- Author: Peter Laws <plaws@plaws.net>
- Date: Mon, 27 Sep 2004 09:57:46 -0500 (CDT)
- Not necessarily .... :-) -- 73, Peter Laws N5UWY/9 WAC (phone) WAS #51466 (SSB) _______________________________________________ RTTY mailing list RTTY@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailm
- /archives//html/RTTY/2004-09/msg00222.html (7,162 bytes)
- 5. Re: [RTTY] Zone 4 (score: 1)
- Author: Bill Turner <dezrat1242@ispwest.com>
- Date: Mon, 27 Sep 2004 08:00:57 -0700
- _________________________________________________________ I would take it a step further and require a separate statement of location, i.e. a callsign should never be used as an indicator of QTH or D
- /archives//html/RTTY/2004-09/msg00224.html (7,639 bytes)
- 6. Re: [RTTY] Zone 4 (score: 1)
- Author: "Alan Curson" <alan@wd9gmk.net>
- Date: Mon, 27 Sep 2004 11:47:06 -0500 (EST)
- I also noticed this after a review of my log. So I don't know if the wrong zone was sent or my software defaulted to what the call sign indicated and I didn't catch it. The other possibility is that
- /archives//html/RTTY/2004-09/msg00240.html (7,989 bytes)
- 7. Re: [RTTY] Zone 4 (score: 1)
- Author: Peter Laws <plaws@plaws.net>
- Date: Mon, 27 Sep 2004 12:59:44 -0500 (CDT)
- N1MM Logger seems to do this. Noticed it the first time this weekend. I assumed it was pulling the whole exchange out of the rx buffer, but evidently not. -- 73, Peter Laws N5UWY/9 WAC (phone) WAS #5
- /archives//html/RTTY/2004-09/msg00246.html (7,558 bytes)
This search system is powered by
Namazu