Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[RTTY\]\s+Why\s+50\s+Baud\s+\?\?\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[RTTY\]\s+Why\s+50\s+Baud\s+\?\?\s*$/: 2 ]

Total 2 documents matching your query.

1. [RTTY] Why 50 Baud ?? (score: 1): Author: w1ksz@arrl.net (Richard W. Solomon); Date: Sat, 15 Jun 2002 16:05:05 -0400; Does anyone know why Ed uses 50 Baud instead of 45 ? It was a frantic few moments this morning switching the KAM to 50 Baud, but I got him !! 73, Dick, W1KSZ; /archives//html/RTTY/2002-06/msg00198.html (6,276 bytes)
2. [RTTY] Why 50 Baud ?? (score: 1): Author: aa5au@bellsouth.net (Don Hill AA5AU); Date: Sat, 15 Jun 2002 21:17:18 -0500; I've spent some time watching Ed the past few weeks on 50 baud. There really isn't much difference. It's like 60 wpm vs. 66 wpm. Remarkably, it's working rather well for him. Even when his signal is; /archives//html/RTTY/2002-06/msg00205.html (8,122 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 2
Page: [1]