And is there a technical basis for it? I am setting up for the sprint. Jerry W4UK _______________________________________________ RTTY mailing list RTTY@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mai
Author: COURYHOUSE--- via RTTY <rtty@contesting.com>
Date: Sun, 24 Apr 2016 13:28:25 -0400
why 75? most of us that run the iron use 60 Ed# _www.smecc.org_ (http://www.smecc.org) In a message dated 4/24/2016 9:09:05 A.M. US Mountain Standard Time, jeflanders@comcast.net writes: And is there
Author: COURYHOUSE--- via RTTY <rtty@contesting.com>
Date: Sun, 24 Apr 2016 14:49:17 -0400
Ok 100 wpm is the new standard with some folk I guess... In a message dated 4/24/2016 11:41:52 A.M. US Mountain Standard Time, ed@w0yk.com writes: 75-baud, 100 wpm. __________________________________
No, 100 wpm is not a new standard for some folks. Once a year there is a 4-hour contest where everyone shifts to 75 baud, 100 wpm to operate. That contest ran today, from 1700z to 2100z. At 2101z eve
Bob said: I have not heard anyone using 75 baud, w100 wpm outside this 4-hour contest sponsored by the BARTG club each year. Which is too bad: 75 baud is way more fun! Ken K6MR Locke No, 100 wpm is n
Author: COURYHOUSE--- via RTTY <rtty@contesting.com>
Date: Sun, 24 Apr 2016 19:50:55 -0400
ok I have one ASR 28 with 100 wpm gears in it there is 75 wpm too but I do not acknowledge that with any hardware all the rest at museum in RTTY and Deaf/hard of hearing tty is 60 wpm. Ed# _www.smecc
-- ORIGINAL MESSAGE --(may be snipped) REPLY: It is also more prone to errors when signals are weak or covered by QRM or QRN, as we find out anew each year during the 75 baud contest. 45.45 baud seem