Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[RTTY\]\s+Waterfall\s+or\s+Spectrum\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[RTTY\]\s+Waterfall\s+or\s+Spectrum\s*$/: 4 ]

Total 4 documents matching your query.

1. [RTTY] Waterfall or Spectrum (score: 1): Author: "Tom Martin" <tmartin@chartermi.net>; Date: Sun, 1 Mar 2009 22:16:39 -0600; I was wondering how many of you guys use the spectrum instead of the waterfall. I never use the wf for RTTY during general QSOs or contests. Is there any advantage to using the wf? Tom W8JWN -- I am; /archives//html/RTTY/2009-03/msg00067.html (6,679 bytes)
2. Re: [RTTY] Waterfall or Spectrum (score: 1): Author: Les Kalmus <w2lk@bk-lk.com>; Date: Mon, 02 Mar 2009 08:31:00 -0500; Tom, I always use the spectrum display. I don't know what the benefits of the waterfall are. Les W2LK _______________________________________________ RTTY mailing list RTTY@contesting.com http://list; /archives//html/RTTY/2009-03/msg00071.html (7,261 bytes)
3. Re: [RTTY] Waterfall or Spectrum (score: 1): Author: Iain MacDonnell - N6ML <ar@dseven.org>; Date: Mon, 02 Mar 2009 10:01:30 -0800; Hmmm. I suppose one benefit could be that it shows some (short) history. If someone tried calling off-frequency, and you didn't get to RIT quickly enough (maybe you were working someone on the other; /archives//html/RTTY/2009-03/msg00087.html (7,878 bytes)
4. Re: [RTTY] Waterfall or Spectrum (score: 1): Author: Kok Chen <chen@mac.com>; Date: Mon, 02 Mar 2009 11:01:38 -0800; On top of that, the eye is extremely good at correlating and picking up "regular" structures in successive scan lines so you can see signals way down into the noise. I had also mentioned to the origi; /archives//html/RTTY/2009-03/msg00088.html (9,875 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 4
Page: [1]