- 1. [RTTY] WE2ASS DQ? (score: 1)
- Author: "Jim W7RY" <jimw7ry@gmail.com>
- Date: Mon, 13 Feb 2017 07:27:45 -0600
- In my opinion, WE2ASS should be disqualified. In the beginning of CQWW WPX, he was only using his call sign. According to the FCC, he is licensed as a Technician. Then later in the contest, he was WE
- /archives//html/RTTY/2017-02/msg00084.html (7,104 bytes)
- 2. Re: [RTTY] WE2ASS DQ? (score: 1)
- Author: "Jeff AC0C" <keepwalking188@ac0c.com>
- Date: Mon, 13 Feb 2017 07:35:10 -0600
- I don't know the fellow. But it's also possible he was a rookie? In any event there are plenty of reasons for screw ups in a contest... 73/jeff/ac0c www.ac0c.com alpha-charlie-zero-charlie In my opin
- /archives//html/RTTY/2017-02/msg00085.html (7,560 bytes)
- 3. Re: [RTTY] WE2ASS DQ? (score: 1)
- Author: Jim W7RY <jimw7ry@gmail.com>
- Date: Mon, 13 Feb 2017 08:04:10 -0600
- Indeed.... need to see his side of the story I guess..... _______________________________________________ RTTY mailing list RTTY@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/rtty
- /archives//html/RTTY/2017-02/msg00086.html (8,763 bytes)
- 4. Re: [RTTY] WE2ASS DQ? (score: 1)
- Author: "Jeff AC0C" <keepwalking188@ac0c.com>
- Date: Mon, 13 Feb 2017 13:52:16 -0600
- I don't know about the other guys, but by the 2nd day all of my fingers have turned to thumbs, I can't hear anything other than a diddle-diddle even when I'm out of the room, and my body won't contro
- /archives//html/RTTY/2017-02/msg00096.html (9,532 bytes)
- 5. Re: [RTTY] WE2ASS DQ? (score: 1)
- Author: Al Kozakiewicz <akozak@hourglass.com>
- Date: Mon, 13 Feb 2017 20:23:42 +0000
- However, this story makes me wonder if the call suffix is ironic or just plain funny! ;^) Al AB2ZY ________________________________________ From: RTTY <rtty-bounces@contesting.com> on behalf of Jeff
- /archives//html/RTTY/2017-02/msg00100.html (10,704 bytes)
- 6. Re: [RTTY] WE2ASS DQ? (score: 1)
- Author: <scottmcleman36@gmail.com>
- Date: Mon, 13 Feb 2017 20:27:18 +0000
- There is a posting on 3830 for this one. I was confusing the hell out of me too over the weekend. Worked as WE2ASS then NY6DX then as WE2ASS/NY6DX Not sure they decided which call to stick with! Thin
- /archives//html/RTTY/2017-02/msg00101.html (11,488 bytes)
- 7. Re: [RTTY] WE2ASS DQ? (score: 1)
- Author: "Jeff AC0C" <keepwalking188@ac0c.com>
- Date: Mon, 13 Feb 2017 14:48:11 -0600
- Why lose points? Follow the basic RTTY log rules 1) log what the guy sends and 2) work and log dupes. 73/jeff/ac0c www.ac0c.com alpha-charlie-zero-charlie --Original Message-- From: scottmcleman36@gm
- /archives//html/RTTY/2017-02/msg00107.html (12,074 bytes)
- 8. Re: [RTTY] WE2ASS DQ? (score: 1)
- Author: "Jim W7RY" <jimw7ry@gmail.com>
- Date: Mon, 13 Feb 2017 19:21:21 -0600
- Contest log checkers need to be aware of this. Especially their refusal to work stations that were a dupe. 73 Jim W7RY There is a posting on 3830 for this one. I was confusing the hell out of me too
- /archives//html/RTTY/2017-02/msg00125.html (12,171 bytes)
- 9. Re: [RTTY] WE2ASS DQ? (score: 1)
- Author: "Jim W7RY" <jimw7ry@gmail.com>
- Date: Mon, 13 Feb 2017 19:27:51 -0600
- Jeff The issues is they appeared to be using the same database and simply changed call signs midway through the contest. N1MM shows that this is a new call, (which it was) but their database had show
- /archives//html/RTTY/2017-02/msg00126.html (13,232 bytes)
This search system is powered by
Namazu