Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[RTTY\]\s+WAEDC\!\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[RTTY\]\s+WAEDC\!\s*$/: 4 ]

Total 4 documents matching your query.

1. [RTTY] WAEDC! (score: 1): Author: "Phil Cooper" <pcooper@guernsey.net>; Date: Sat, 22 Oct 2005 19:13:04 +0100; Hi all, I know that JARTS has only just finished, and some of you may be playing in the CIS contest, but that great contest - WAEDC will soon be here! That is the one with QTC's, which seems to frigh; /archives//html/RTTY/2005-10/msg00267.html (7,082 bytes)
2. Re: [RTTY] WAEDC! (score: 1): Author: Bill Turner <dezrat1242@ispwest.com>; Date: Sat, 22 Oct 2005 19:28:38 -0700; ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ It isn't frightening, Phil, it's boring. I can't think of anything more useless than sending a list of previous contacts. If they ever make the excha; /archives//html/RTTY/2005-10/msg00274.html (7,229 bytes)
3. Re: [RTTY] WAEDC! (score: 1): Author: "Tom Moore" <wx4tm@tm-moore.com>; Date: Sun, 23 Oct 2005 04:09:18 -0500; in principle I somewhat agree, Bill.. However, I think the adrenlin surges a tad with the challenge to accurately copy and send the max nr of mesgs.. in a way, sorta like maintaining that '80' or '90; /archives//html/RTTY/2005-10/msg00277.html (8,454 bytes)
4. Re: [RTTY] WAEDC! (score: 1): Author: Bill Turner <dezrat1242@ispwest.com>; Date: Sun, 23 Oct 2005 08:05:48 -0700; ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ Different strokes for different folks, Tom. For me, it's the thrill of the QSO, not the information exchanged, but I see your point too. 73, Bill W6W; /archives//html/RTTY/2005-10/msg00283.html (7,741 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 4
Page: [1]