Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[RTTY\]\s+WAE\s+Macros\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[RTTY\]\s+WAE\s+Macros\s*$/: 15 ]

Total 15 documents matching your query.

1. [RTTY] WAE Macros (score: 1): Author: Dick-W0RAA <dickt@w0raa.com>; Date: Mon, 7 Nov 2016 10:01:15 -0700; Tom, There is no need to have any station repeat the RST they send you. Everybody sends 599, even if they can barely hear you. Have a macro that requests their number and one that sends your number.; /archives//html/RTTY/2016-11/msg00013.html (7,382 bytes)
2. Re: [RTTY] WAE Macros (score: 1): Author: Thom <ki8w@ki8w.com>; Date: Mon, 7 Nov 2016 17:08:40 +0000; I agree...I just have a macro that says resend exchange. Anyway, everyone will get 559 from me from now on. Lets see if the logging robots can handle that. LOL Hope to work you as well. -- 73 Thom KI; /archives//html/RTTY/2016-11/msg00014.html (7,388 bytes)
3. Re: [RTTY] WAE Macros (score: 1): Author: Jerry Flanders <jeflanders@comcast.net>; Date: Mon, 07 Nov 2016 12:17:59 -0500; Don't do that, Thom. 559 will cause lots of problems, and some of the guys will catch it and have you repeat it. Better to play the game with the same rules the rest of us are using, right or wrong.; /archives//html/RTTY/2016-11/msg00015.html (8,071 bytes)
4. Re: [RTTY] WAE Macros (score: 1): Author: "John Barber" <john@bordertech.co.uk>; Date: Mon, 07 Nov 2016 12:35:11 -0500; No please don't do that. It just wastes time for everyone. The robots may be OK but everyone else will be unhappy! And if a certain YT station sends your report without the RST, ask him to send it. I; /archives//html/RTTY/2016-11/msg00016.html (8,356 bytes)
5. Re: [RTTY] WAE Macros (score: 1): Author: Thom <ki8w@ki8w.com>; Date: Mon, 7 Nov 2016 17:51:52 +0000; Yep I changed it back. 599 it is. But I still think I will be asking for a lot of repeats. I live in the Black Hole of RF. I am in the skip zone for every path in the USA. JARTS was a blooming nightm; /archives//html/RTTY/2016-11/msg00017.html (7,948 bytes)
6. Re: [RTTY] WAE Macros (score: 1): Author: "John Barber" <john@bordertech.co.uk>; Date: Mon, 07 Nov 2016 13:14:44 -0500; than a second. Thom, that's not right. Normal RTTY speed is 45.45 baud, 60 WPM. 45 letters a second would be about 6 times as fast. John GW4SKA Yep I changed it back. 599 it is. But I still think I; /archives//html/RTTY/2016-11/msg00020.html (9,466 bytes)
7. Re: [RTTY] WAE Macros (score: 1): Author: Jeff Stai <wk6i.jeff@gmail.com>; Date: Mon, 7 Nov 2016 10:17:53 -0800; hi Thom - This may help a little: http://www.ncccsprint.com/rttyns.html 73 jeff wk6i -- Jeff Stai ~ wk6i.jeff@gmail.com Twisted Oak Winery ~ http://www.twistedoak.com/ Facebook ~ http://www.facebook.; /archives//html/RTTY/2016-11/msg00021.html (8,200 bytes)
8. Re: [RTTY] WAE Macros (score: 1): Author: W4AAW@aol.com via RTTY <rtty@contesting.com>; Date: Mon, 07 Nov 2016 13:36:08 -0500; Do we have to endure a breath-by-breath description of this guy's every move regarding RTTY? Don't do that, Thom. 559 will cause lots of problems, and some of the guys will catch it and have you repe; /archives//html/RTTY/2016-11/msg00022.html (8,679 bytes)
9. Re: [RTTY] WAE Macros (score: 1): Author: <scottmcleman36@gmail.com>; Date: Mon, 7 Nov 2016 18:40:16 +0000; Memoirs maybe ? ........ 73 MM0LID Scott Mcleman Do we have to endure a breath-by-breath description of this guy's every move regarding RTTY? Don't do that, Thom. 559 will cause lots of problems, and; /archives//html/RTTY/2016-11/msg00023.html (8,690 bytes)
10. Re: [RTTY] WAE Macros (score: 1): Author: Thom <ki8w@ki8w.com>; Date: Mon, 7 Nov 2016 18:49:20 +0000; then I will leave the list. goodbye Don't do that, Thom. 559 will cause lots of problems, and some of the guys will catch it and have you repeat it. Better to play the game with the same rules the re; /archives//html/RTTY/2016-11/msg00024.html (9,048 bytes)
11. Re: [RTTY] WAE Macros (score: 1): Author: <scottmcleman36@gmail.com>; Date: Mon, 7 Nov 2016 18:50:19 +0000; Also, Further down this thread you say your antennas are at less than 30 feet etc. Let me paint you a picture right now.. Due to storms we have at my home in Scotland. ALL and I mean ALL of my outdoo; /archives//html/RTTY/2016-11/msg00025.html (8,984 bytes)
12. Re: [RTTY] WAE Macros (score: 1): Author: Timothy Holmes <taholmes160@gmail.com>; Date: Mon, 07 Nov 2016 21:41:08 +0000; Really? REALLT??? Is that how people on this list feel about those of us trying to learn? Speak up now man, cause if it is, im following Thom our the door. Im not sure which is worse, that W4AAW said; /archives//html/RTTY/2016-11/msg00028.html (7,431 bytes)
13. Re: [RTTY] WAE Macros (score: 1): Author: "John Barber" <john@bordertech.co.uk>; Date: Mon, 07 Nov 2016 18:10:47 -0500; Tim, I was too annoyed to write anything rational here, so mailed Thom direct with this: ' The way I see it, the reflector is to encourage RTTY operation, answer questions and be a place to share kno; /archives//html/RTTY/2016-11/msg00030.html (8,852 bytes)
14. Re: [RTTY] WAE Macros (score: 1): Author: Stanley Zawrotny <k4sbz.stan@gmail.com>; Date: Mon, 7 Nov 2016 19:36:55 -0500; I'm not always able to keep up-to-the-hour with the posts in the forum and am sometimes half a day behind. So I am a bit late in jumping in on W4AAW's post. To me it was completely out-of-line with t; /archives//html/RTTY/2016-11/msg00031.html (9,283 bytes)
15. Re: [RTTY] WAE Macros (score: 1): Author: Shelby Summerville <k4ww@twc.com>; Date: Mon, 7 Nov 2016 20:07:57 -0500; C'ya, Shelby As I don't have an iPhone, nor an iPad, sent from my PC _______________________________________________ RTTY mailing list RTTY@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo; /archives//html/RTTY/2016-11/msg00033.html (7,157 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 15
Page: [1]