Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[RTTY\]\s+W1AW\s+80M\s+RTTY\s+Interference\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[RTTY\]\s+W1AW\s+80M\s+RTTY\s+Interference\s*$/: 2 ]

Total 2 documents matching your query.

1. [RTTY] W1AW 80M RTTY Interference (score: 1): Author: Wa3frp via RTTY <rtty@contesting.com>; Date: Tue, 10 Jun 2014 12:16:35 -0400 (EDT); FYI Only A year or so ago, I asked ARRL if anything could be done to move the 80M W1AW CW transmission to a lower frequency on the 80M band. This was done within the context of the interference that; /archives//html/RTTY/2014-06/msg00114.html (7,647 bytes)
2. Re: [RTTY] W1AW 80M RTTY Interference (score: 1): Author: W0MU Mike Fatchett <w0mu@w0mu.com>; Date: Tue, 10 Jun 2014 10:24:49 -0600; Hard to believe since CW can be used everywhere in the band...................... Sounds like a QFU to me. Mike W0MU A year or so ago, I asked ARRL if anything could be done to move the 80M W1AW CW t; /archives//html/RTTY/2014-06/msg00116.html (7,806 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 2
Page: [1]