Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[RTTY\]\s+TinyFSK\s+vs\s+MMTTYFSK\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[RTTY\]\s+TinyFSK\s+vs\s+MMTTYFSK\s*$/: 2 ]

Total 2 documents matching your query.

1. [RTTY] TinyFSK vs MMTTYFSK (score: 1): Author: "Dave Hachadorian" <k6ll.dave@gmail.com>; Date: Mon, 22 Dec 2014 19:53:13 -0700; After my recent experience where nobody could copy my 2Tone FSK signal, there was mention of TinyFSK as a viable method for generating high quality FSK. I invested $10 in one of these: http://www.sai; /archives//html/RTTY/2014-12/msg00085.html (7,764 bytes)
2. Re: [RTTY] TinyFSK vs MMTTYFSK (score: 1): Author: "David G3YYD" <g3yyd@btinternet.com>; Date: Tue, 23 Dec 2014 05:27:59 -0500; Yes decidedly so. It is exactly timed for best performance and will be as good as sound card AFSK but the resultant on air signal will be a lot wider than an AFSK generated one. (The only rig I know; /archives//html/RTTY/2014-12/msg00086.html (8,363 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 2
Page: [1]