Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[RTTY\]\s+Three\s+lessons\s+from\s+NAQP\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[RTTY\]\s+Three\s+lessons\s+from\s+NAQP\s*$/: 44 ]

Total 44 documents matching your query.

21. Re: [RTTY] Three lessons from NAQP (score: 1): Author: "Shelby Summerville" <k4ww@arrl.net>; Date: Tue, 1 Mar 2011 03:47:33 -0500; Jeff, AC0C wrote: " Sending the station's call you just worked does not benefit anyone." An opinion to which you are entitled, but I don't completely agree with. On a few occasions, I have had the ca; /archives//html/RTTY/2011-03/msg00000.html (6,533 bytes)
22. Re: [RTTY] Three lessons from NAQP (score: 1): Author: Ian White GM3SEK <gm3sek@ifwtech.co.uk>; Date: Tue, 1 Mar 2011 09:19:19 +0000; Agreed - the length of the exchanges always has to be balanced against the risk of points penalties for incorrect logging. That balance is constantly shifting so there is no solution that fits all ca; /archives//html/RTTY/2011-03/msg00001.html (8,204 bytes)
23. Re: [RTTY] Three lessons from NAQP (score: 1): Author: "Gordon LaPoint" <n1mgo1@verizon.net>; Date: Tue, 01 Mar 2011 06:02:29 -0500; Gary, We use "Bambi" because using our names was too confusing! We always run Multi-2, and the rules state that you can send each operators name, as they operate. When we tried that we got people tel; /archives//html/RTTY/2011-03/msg00005.html (10,394 bytes)
24. Re: [RTTY] Three lessons from NAQP (score: 1): Author: "Bill, W6WRT" <dezrat1242@yahoo.com>; Date: Tue, 01 Mar 2011 06:11:04 -0800; ORIGINAL MESSAGE: REPLY: I'm not so sure about that. During every contest there will be times where two or more stations are calling me at the same time and with QRM and QRN it isn't always clear to; /archives//html/RTTY/2011-03/msg00006.html (8,347 bytes)
25. Re: [RTTY] Three lessons from NAQP (score: 1): Author: David Levine <david@levinecentral.com>; Date: Tue, 1 Mar 2011 09:21:04 -0500; I agree and I'm sticking with YourCall TU MyCall CQ Sorry, but you have to wait for the TU after YourCall or you can tune away on YourCall if you want. K2DSL - David _________________________________; /archives//html/RTTY/2011-03/msg00007.html (8,771 bytes)
26. Re: [RTTY] Three lessons from NAQP (score: 1): Author: "Bill, W6WRT" <dezrat1242@yahoo.com>; Date: Tue, 01 Mar 2011 06:52:31 -0800; ORIGINAL MESSAGE: REPLY: You have a good point about putting the call first and TU second. For years that's the way I did it but recently I changed after hearing some discussion to the contrary. Now; /archives//html/RTTY/2011-03/msg00008.html (8,415 bytes)
27. Re: [RTTY] Three lessons from NAQP (score: 1): Author: WS7I <ws7ik7tj@gmail.com>; Date: Tue, 1 Mar 2011 07:08:46 -0800; Not really, when I see WS I'm gone. Frankly all of these "micro managers" on this list are missing some key points. Accuracy as Shelby so aptly pointed out, and the receiver if they are in all that m; /archives//html/RTTY/2011-03/msg00010.html (10,134 bytes)
28. Re: [RTTY] Three lessons from NAQP (score: 1): Author: Ktfrog007@aol.com; Date: Tue, 1 Mar 2011 10:41:48 -0500 (EST); Thumper? Flower? 73, Kermit, AB1J In a message dated 3/1/2011 1:53:52 P.M. GMT Standard Time, n1mgo1@verizon.net writes: The "Bambi" team, Gordon - N1MGO, Charlie - KT1I, Ray- KB1LRL, Pauline - KB1JX; /archives//html/RTTY/2011-03/msg00014.html (7,746 bytes)
29. Re: [RTTY] Three lessons from NAQP (score: 1): Author: "Tom Osborne" <w7why@frontier.com>; Date: Tue, 1 Mar 2011 09:01:01 -0800; Hi Shelby Most software will send the corrected call--if you have that checked. If I correct my call and they just come back with QSL QRZ without sending the corrected call, I just delete the contac; /archives//html/RTTY/2011-03/msg00020.html (9,617 bytes)
30. Re: [RTTY] Three lessons from NAQP (score: 1): Author: Mike <k4gmh@arrl.net>; Date: Tue, 1 Mar 2011 12:03:59 -0500; Hello Gordon, Keep "Bambi", but go to VT. Missed the VT mult. in the recent NAQP:>) Regarding the sending of the other stations call at the start of a run QSO, this is what I've been recently using:; /archives//html/RTTY/2011-03/msg00021.html (15,531 bytes)
31. Re: [RTTY] Three lessons from NAQP (score: 1): Author: "Ed Muns" <ed@w0yk.com>; Date: Tue, 1 Mar 2011 09:23:47 -0800; I agree with each of Mike's several very good points below. A key inference from all his comments is to make messages modular so that two or more can be dynamically combined to create the appropriate; /archives//html/RTTY/2011-03/msg00022.html (18,663 bytes)
32. Re: [RTTY] Three lessons from NAQP (score: 1): Author: Claude Du Berger <duberger.miousse81@globetrotter.net>; Date: Tue, 01 Mar 2011 12:49:43 -0500; I do as Tom. I even removed the call before TU in my {logthenpop} macro... 73, claude VE2FK Most software will send the corrected call--if you have that checked. If I correct my call and they just co; /archives//html/RTTY/2011-03/msg00025.html (9,143 bytes)
33. Re: [RTTY] Three lessons from NAQP (score: 1): Author: Hank Garretson <w6sx@arrl.net>; Date: Tue, 1 Mar 2011 13:09:51 -0800; If I correct my call and they just come back with QSL QRZ without sending I gently suggest that this might be a bit harsh. 1. The other guy may have had your call correct all along, sent it correctly; /archives//html/RTTY/2011-03/msg00029.html (9,642 bytes)
34. Re: [RTTY] Three lessons from NAQP (score: 1): Author: "Tom Osborne" <w7why@frontier.com>; Date: Tue, 1 Mar 2011 14:08:06 -0800; Hi Hank If the guy gets dinged enough for not letting the caller know he has copied the correct call, he might start doing it. I've had a bunch of Q's where the guy sent my call wrong in the exchange; /archives//html/RTTY/2011-03/msg00032.html (9,668 bytes)
35. Re: [RTTY] Three lessons from NAQP (score: 1): Author: "Gary AL9A" <al9a@mtaonline.net>; Date: Tue, 1 Mar 2011 15:17:52 -0900; Gordon, I can understand the confusion over using different names in Multi-2 situation. I've run across that myself from time to time. Maybe it's just the way my brain is wired, but when I see BAMBI; /archives//html/RTTY/2011-03/msg00033.html (13,603 bytes)
36. Re: [RTTY] Three lessons from NAQP (score: 1): Author: "Don Hill AA5AU" <aa5au@bellsouth.net>; Date: Tue, 1 Mar 2011 18:37:22 -0600; Using multiple names from the same station is crazy and should probably be eliminated from the rules. One thing that I try hard to do is to verify that I have every single contact correct before I lo; /archives//html/RTTY/2011-03/msg00035.html (14,949 bytes)
37. Re: [RTTY] Three lessons from NAQP (score: 1): Author: "Gary AL9A" <al9a@mtaonline.net>; Date: Tue, 1 Mar 2011 15:37:34 -0900; I agree with the concept of modular macros, up to a point. My problem with chaining together two or more macros is if they contain a %E at the end which causes the TX to drop and then quickly start u; /archives//html/RTTY/2011-03/msg00036.html (10,645 bytes)
38. Re: [RTTY] Three lessons from NAQP (score: 1): Author: "Ed Muns" <ed@w0yk.com>; Date: Tue, 1 Mar 2011 16:54:52 -0800; I understand your concern and agree that the messages should come across to the other operators as making sense. First of all, most of the time the nominal messages will be used so there is no issue.; /archives//html/RTTY/2011-03/msg00037.html (12,215 bytes)
39. Re: [RTTY] Three lessons from NAQP (score: 1): Author: Jerry Flanders <jeflanders@comcast.net>; Date: Tue, 01 Mar 2011 21:45:03 -0500; I have never had a pause between macros here using Writelog. What program are you using, Gary? Jerry w4UK _______________________________________________ RTTY mailing list RTTY@contesting.com http://; /archives//html/RTTY/2011-03/msg00041.html (11,403 bytes)
40. Re: [RTTY] Three lessons from NAQP (score: 1): Author: "Bill, W6WRT" <dezrat1242@yahoo.com>; Date: Tue, 01 Mar 2011 20:13:59 -0800; ORIGINAL MESSAGE: REPLY: What if the message was WS7I AGN AGN? 73, Bill W6WRT _______________________________________________ RTTY mailing list RTTY@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman; /archives//html/RTTY/2011-03/msg00043.html (8,612 bytes)

Current List: 21 - 40
Page: [1] [2] [3]