Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[RTTY\]\s+The\s+perfect\s+delay\s+for\s+run\s+CQ\?\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[RTTY\]\s+The\s+perfect\s+delay\s+for\s+run\s+CQ\?\s*$/: 7 ]

Total 7 documents matching your query.

1. [RTTY] The perfect delay for run CQ? (score: 1): Author: Rich NU6T <rehill@ix.netcom.com>; Date: Wed, 12 Jan 2011 18:39:41 -0800; Curious what y'all use for CQ delay in your run macro? I tried values from 3 to 5 seconds and it seemed that about 4 seconds worked. Running barefoot to dipoles, or 400W to dipoles. New to rtty conte; /archives//html/RTTY/2011-01/msg00406.html (7,022 bytes)
2. Re: [RTTY] The perfect delay for run CQ? (score: 1): Author: Peter Laws <plaws@plaws.net>; Date: Wed, 12 Jan 2011 20:45:13 -0600; 100 W to wire here, too. I did have it at 4.3 seconds but dropped it to 3.5 s. Peter -- Peter Laws | N5UWY | plaws plaws net | Travel by Train! _______________________________________________ RTTY ma; /archives//html/RTTY/2011-01/msg00407.html (6,933 bytes)
3. Re: [RTTY] The perfect delay for run CQ? (score: 1): Author: Fabi va2up <va2up@live.ca>; Date: Wed, 12 Jan 2011 22:06:12 -0500; Rich welcome first of all, there is no such thing as a perfect delay time. Only you can tell if you need to make it longer or shorter according to the type of conditions you will encounter. 4 sec is; /archives//html/RTTY/2011-01/msg00408.html (8,552 bytes)
4. Re: [RTTY] The perfect delay for run CQ? (score: 1): Author: Ktfrog007@aol.com; Date: Sun, 16 Jan 2011 10:21:49 -0500 (EST); Hi Rich, I ran across your email while reviewing my in-box this morning. I run my rig at full power on RTTY in contests although 50% is the recommendation. Therefore, I use a delay about the same len; /archives//html/RTTY/2011-01/msg00564.html (7,747 bytes)
5. Re: [RTTY] The perfect delay for run CQ? (score: 1): Author: "Bill, W6WRT" <dezrat1242@yahoo.com>; Date: Sun, 16 Jan 2011 09:49:21 -0800; ORIGINAL MESSAGE: REPLY: I'm guessing you have a Yaesu, right? Yaesu recommends a 50% duty cycle, but I have had a couple of Yaesus in the past and ran them at full power on RTTY with no problem. Nor; /archives//html/RTTY/2011-01/msg00569.html (7,758 bytes)
6. Re: [RTTY] The perfect delay for run CQ? (score: 1): Author: "Anthony J. Cioffi" <n2ki@amsat.org>; Date: Sun, 16 Jan 2011 17:53:04 +0000; I have a 1KMP and run the radio at no more than 50 watts. However, I let the amp do its job to brings thing up to higher operating levels when needed. Sent From Blackberry Anthony J. Cioffi www.n2ki.; /archives//html/RTTY/2011-01/msg00570.html (9,033 bytes)
7. Re: [RTTY] The perfect delay for run CQ? (score: 1): Author: Steve **KT0DX** <kt0dx@comcast.net>; Date: Sun, 16 Jan 2011 23:12:37 +0000; Ran a FT1000MP for 7 years at full power in RTTY contests and never a problem on this end. Used the FTDX5000 at 100 watts in this past RTTY RU and no issues there also. Steve KT0DX __________________; /archives//html/RTTY/2011-01/msg00584.html (8,745 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 7
Page: [1]