Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[RTTY\]\s+T8NF\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[RTTY\]\s+T8NF\s*$/: 10 ]

Total 10 documents matching your query.

1. [RTTY] T8NF (score: 1): Author: rick darwicki <n6pe@yahoo.com>; Date: Wed, 8 Apr 2009 08:29:16 -0700 (PDT); I worked T88NF the other day on 20 RTTY and have been seeing a lot of posts for T8NF. Are there two stations out there or did I get the call wrong? TNX Rick, N6PE == Remember, E = M * C^2 was not the; /archives//html/RTTY/2009-04/msg00050.html (6,482 bytes)
2. Re: [RTTY] T8NF (score: 1): Author: "Bill, W6WRT" <dezrat1242@yahoo.com>; Date: Wed, 08 Apr 2009 09:26:36 -0700; ORIGINAL MESSAGE: REPLY: You got it right. Both stations have been active. Both have been reported in the Daily DX Bulletin. 73, Bill W6WRT _______________________________________________ RTTY mailin; /archives//html/RTTY/2009-04/msg00051.html (6,830 bytes)
3. Re: [RTTY] T8NF (score: 1): Author: "FireBrick" <w9ol@billnjudy.com>; Date: Wed, 8 Apr 2009 12:11:55 -0500; I 'think' and that's the operative word here That the two stations T88NF and T8CW are being confused I worked each of these two callsigns and am 100% sure I copied each different call correctly. One; /archives//html/RTTY/2009-04/msg00052.html (8,071 bytes)
4. Re: [RTTY] T8NF (score: 1): Author: Iain MacDonnell - N6ML <ar@dseven.org>; Date: Wed, 08 Apr 2009 10:19:22 -0700; According to the announced operations, both calls start with "T88"... *shrug* ~Iain / N6ML "T8 - JH0IXE (T88CW) and JA0FOX (T88NF) will be active from Palau on 4-12 April. They plan to operate CW, SS; /archives//html/RTTY/2009-04/msg00053.html (8,934 bytes)
5. Re: [RTTY] T8NF (score: 1): Author: "W0MU Mike Fatchett" <w0mu@w0mu.com>; Date: Wed, 8 Apr 2009 11:24:32 -0600; So do you believe what your radio received and the print you received or do you depend on others to tell you who you worked? You worked who you logged. If you believe spot data alone shame on you. I; /archives//html/RTTY/2009-04/msg00054.html (9,140 bytes)
6. Re: [RTTY] T8NF (score: 1): Author: "Robert Chudek - K0RC" <k0rc@citlink.net>; Date: Wed, 8 Apr 2009 12:41:22 -0500; Heh heh... Yup Mike, log what you receive. I just reviewed my UBN report from the 2008 CW Sweepstakes. There were a number of stations who got a busted QSO because their computer logged North Dakota; /archives//html/RTTY/2009-04/msg00055.html (10,677 bytes)
7. Re: [RTTY] T8NF (score: 1): Author: "W0MU Mike Fatchett" <w0mu@w0mu.com>; Date: Wed, 8 Apr 2009 15:14:47 -0600; I operate from CO and MT and people are always losing contacts for the same reason. How could it be a contact if one does not even know who they worked. Heck if you need the card so bad send QSL's to; /archives//html/RTTY/2009-04/msg00057.html (12,102 bytes)
8. Re: [RTTY] T8NF (score: 1): Author: "Jack West" <w7ld@theriver.com>; Date: Wed, 8 Apr 2009 14:53:49 -0700; Yeah, Thats like ur RST 599 ...pse repeat all again 73 de Jack / W7LD / "Lucky Dog" I operate from CO and MT and people are always losing contacts for the same reason. How could it be a contact if on; /archives//html/RTTY/2009-04/msg00058.html (12,703 bytes)
9. Re: [RTTY] T8NF (score: 1): Author: "Bill, W6WRT" <dezrat1242@yahoo.com>; Date: Wed, 08 Apr 2009 15:15:46 -0700; IGINAL MESSAGE: REPLY: Good question. Several times I have received a QSL card for a legitimate QSO and included in the envelope were two or more blank cards. I could have been the first California t; /archives//html/RTTY/2009-04/msg00061.html (8,064 bytes)
10. Re: [RTTY] T8NF (score: 1): Author: <nz4o@tampabay.rr.com>; Date: Wed, 8 Apr 2009 19:04:05 -0400; Today I printed T8NF repeatedly on 10138.465 kc beginning at 2222 UTC. Unfortunately he could not get my call correct so it's a busted QSO :<(( It was long path at 26163 km with a heading of 131 degr; /archives//html/RTTY/2009-04/msg00062.html (7,714 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 10
Page: [1]