Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[RTTY\]\s+Spotting\s+frequency\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[RTTY\]\s+Spotting\s+frequency\s*$/: 4 ]

Total 4 documents matching your query.

1. [RTTY] Spotting Frequency (score: 1): Author: WS7I <ws7ik7tj@gmail.com>; Date: Fri, 29 Apr 2011 14:21:54 -0700; The standard for hasn't changed any. If you are running non-standard Mark and Spaces then YOU adjust where you spot things. 18 Mhz is rather intersting this afternoon. _______________________________; /archives//html/RTTY/2011-04/msg00157.html (6,293 bytes)
2. [RTTY] Spotting frequency (score: 1): Author: Steve Jarrett <k4fj@aol.com>; Date: Wed, 24 Aug 2011 18:23:38 -0400 (EDT); Hi, I have noticed an increase in the number of packet spots showing the spotters tx frequency instead of the dx stations tx frequency. Do some radios provide tx vfo data vice rx vfo data when in spl; /archives//html/RTTY/2011-08/msg00329.html (6,442 bytes)
3. Re: [RTTY] Spotting frequency (score: 1): Author: Dick Kriss <aa5vu@att.net>; Date: Thu, 25 Aug 2011 14:45:43 -0500; Steve K4FJ, A similar topic came up this morning on the fldigi reflector and the following is a copy/paste of my comments about rtty-split operation and logging. -- Fldigi correctly reports and logs; /archives//html/RTTY/2011-08/msg00334.html (8,567 bytes)
4. Re: [RTTY] Spotting frequency (score: 1): Author: Al Kozakiewicz <akozak@hourglass.com>; Date: Thu, 25 Aug 2011 15:55:21 -0400; I think the issue is that polling interval of the transceiver is longer than the time between the end of a transmission and logging/spotting a QSO. Especially if the logging program doesn't know or c; /archives//html/RTTY/2011-08/msg00335.html (9,516 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 4
Page: [1]