Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[RTTY\]\s+Soundcard\s+Query\s+\+\s+W4UK\s+comment\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[RTTY\]\s+Soundcard\s+Query\s+\+\s+W4UK\s+comment\s*$/: 2 ]

Total 2 documents matching your query.

1. Re: [RTTY] Soundcard Query + W4UK comment (score: 1): Author: "Phil Cooper" <pcooper@guernsey.net>; Date: Tue, 16 Oct 2007 21:46:31 +0100; Evening all, Jerry, I suspect that is simply down to the way some manufacturers handle their hardware control. It may well be that Compaq can (and maybe do) prevent the use of a 2nd soundcard. I have; /archives//html/RTTY/2007-10/msg00284.html (8,237 bytes)
2. Re: [RTTY] Soundcard Query + W4UK comment (score: 1): Author: Jerry Flanders <jeflanders@comcast.net>; Date: Tue, 16 Oct 2007 17:05:42 -0400; No - it was not "controlled" or prevented in any way - the tech support people simply did not know, or chose not to tell me, that it was a BIOS option. From the conversation I remember, they simply d; /archives//html/RTTY/2007-10/msg00285.html (8,391 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 2
Page: [1]