Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[RTTY\]\s+Shelby\'s\s+\-\s+version\s+of\s+SO1R\s+vs\s+SO2R\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[RTTY\]\s+Shelby\'s\s+\-\s+version\s+of\s+SO1R\s+vs\s+SO2R\s*$/: 2 ]

Total 2 documents matching your query.

1. Re: [RTTY] Shelby's - version of SO1R vs SO2R (score: 1): Author: "Ron Stailey" <k5dj@austin.rr.com>; Date: Sat, 22 Jul 2006 15:11:44 -0500; Shelby, that's fine with me. If I do the NAQP RTTY test in 2007. I will be happy to print out my summary sheet and sign the sucker saying I used ONE radio, and I won't be wrong. I would also send a s; /archives//html/RTTY/2006-07/msg00265.html (10,857 bytes)
2. Re: [RTTY] Shelby's - version of SO1R vs SO2R (score: 1): Author: Jay <ws7i@ewarg.org>; Date: Sat, 22 Jul 2006 13:17:22 -0700; Fine idea Shelby, the NAQP was devised to be flexible and being the contest manager does give one the ability to suggest that new things be tried. As one of the creators of the ARRL RTTY Roundup and; /archives//html/RTTY/2006-07/msg00266.html (12,180 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 2
Page: [1]