Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[RTTY\]\s+SO2R\s+$again$\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[RTTY\]\s+SO2R\s+$again$\s*$/: 20 ]

Total 20 documents matching your query.

1. [RTTY] SO2R (again) (score: 1): Author: wa0sxv at mellinger.com (Mike Mellinger WA0SXV); Date: Fri Jan 24 15:39:59 2003; I will never really understand the SO2R debate. Nor the bizarre rule changes that take place to try and stop it. It is as if the anti-SO2R group would suddenly win major contests simply because the c; /archives//html/RTTY/2003-01/msg00325.html (8,329 bytes)
2. [RTTY] SO2R (again) (score: 1): Author: aa5au at bellsouth.net (Don Hill AA5AU); Date: Fri Jan 24 20:08:56 2003; Nothing like a good ol' SO2R debate to get the blood going again. Good points Mike... Look at the current RTTY World Ranking list to find K4GMH at #2 and WX4TM as #4 in the world. Both are single rad; /archives//html/RTTY/2003-01/msg00333.html (9,629 bytes)
3. [RTTY] SO2R (again) (score: 1): Author: w7ti at dslextreme.com (Bill Turner); Date: Fri Jan 24 23:03:46 2003; _________________________________________________________ IMO, here's the main difference between the two classes: With SO1R, a typical station will transmit perhaps 50% of the time and listen 50%. (; /archives//html/RTTY/2003-01/msg00338.html (8,463 bytes)
4. [RTTY] SO2R (again) (score: 1): Author: w2up at mindspring.com (Barry ); Date: Sat Jan 25 08:12:15 2003; Bill, The Indy 500 isn't a good analogy, as not everyone can compete. One has to qualify, right? For argument's sake, let's say I did qualify to compete. If I expected to be competitive in the Indy 5; /archives//html/RTTY/2003-01/msg00341.html (9,101 bytes)
5. [RTTY] SO2R (again) (score: 1): Author: wa9als at starband.net (WA9ALS - John); Date: Sat Jan 25 08:45:35 2003; Bill, if you haven't already, would you comment on Don's post about K4GMH reaching #2 on the World Rank list as a 1R guy? Apparently Mike has found a way to be competitive. ;-); /archives//html/RTTY/2003-01/msg00342.html (8,919 bytes)
6. [RTTY] SO2R (again) (score: 1): Author: w9ol at billnjudy.com (FireBrick); Date: Sat Jan 25 09:22:19 2003; A much better analogy Barry and very good points. I'm one of those 'third tier' contesters. Station is modest and I play for fun. I don't care how many radios you use. If there is only one signal on; /archives//html/RTTY/2003-01/msg00343.html (10,479 bytes)
7. [RTTY] SO2R (again) (score: 1): Author: k8vt at ameritech.net (Carter Grabarczyk); Date: Sat Jan 25 09:42:07 2003; But that's NOT the point. We have separate classes for high power and low power and nobody argues with that. However, that's not to say that a low power guy couldn't do well, but again, not the point; /archives//html/RTTY/2003-01/msg00344.html (10,163 bytes)
8. [RTTY] SO2R (again) (score: 1): Author: k8vt at ameritech.net (Carter Grabarczyk); Date: Sat Jan 25 10:25:34 2003; Barry, Respectfully, to your statement above, I say "Bunk"... Does having a high power/low power or single op/ multi op category "stifle progress and competition"? I think not (or at least I haven't; /archives//html/RTTY/2003-01/msg00345.html (10,084 bytes)
9. [RTTY] SO2R (again) (score: 1): Author: etienne.rosseel at pandora.be (Etienne/ON7UI); Date: Sat Jan 25 10:35:54 2003; Ok, but there also are 10000+ who are competing on 100,200,400,800,1000,5000,10000,cross,prof,amateur etc. Most of them can make a choice to compete where they believe they are good/best. You traine; /archives//html/RTTY/2003-01/msg00346.html (9,550 bytes)
10. [RTTY] SO2R (again) (score: 1): Author: aa5au at bellsouth.net (Don Hill AA5AU); Date: Sat Jan 25 10:45:07 2003; It was explained very well by Tyler, K3MM. It doesn't make sense to wipe out years of records by creating a separate SO2R class. I would support adding a new SO1R class. You could start and set your; /archives//html/RTTY/2003-01/msg00347.html (8,680 bytes)
11. [RTTY] SO2R (again) (score: 1): Author: w9ol at billnjudy.com (FireBrick); Date: Sat Jan 25 11:14:11 2003; 1 op, 1 signal on the air at a time, 1 class who cares how many radios there are. And good news on the Belkin. I have the older version which DID not work. out adding a new SOAB of testing and; /archives//html/RTTY/2003-01/msg00348.html (9,646 bytes)
12. [RTTY] SO2R (again) (score: 1): Author: w2up at mindspring.com (Barry ); Date: Sat Jan 25 11:51:42 2003; Comments interspersed below... In my mind, and that of the contest organizers, there are significant differences. Single op is single op - one person. Multiop is not single op - more than one person.; /archives//html/RTTY/2003-01/msg00349.html (12,971 bytes)
13. [RTTY] SO2R (again) (score: 1): Author: wa9als at starband.net (WA9ALS - John); Date: Sat Jan 25 12:06:51 2003; But why single that out? Why not stacked antennas or towers?? As WA0SXV said, those make more difference than 2R or even power. So why pick on SO2R and not the other factors??; /archives//html/RTTY/2003-01/msg00350.html (8,770 bytes)
14. [RTTY] SO2R (again) (score: 1): Author: k4ww at arrl.net (Shelby Summerville); Date: Sat Jan 25 12:21:38 2003; Don Hill AA5AU" <aa5au@bellsouth.net wrote: " I would support adding a new SO1R class. You could start and set your own records. We could have an SOAB class as we always do and then have an SO1R clas; /archives//html/RTTY/2003-01/msg00351.html (9,298 bytes)
15. [RTTY] SO2R (again) (score: 1): Author: w7ti at dslextreme.com (Bill Turner); Date: Sat Jan 25 15:08:17 2003; _________________________________________________________ Barry, I think it IS a good analogy. My point was not about qualifying, it was about a full-out, flat-out race between an Indy car and the fa; /archives//html/RTTY/2003-01/msg00352.html (10,232 bytes)
16. [RTTY] SO2R (again) (score: 1): Author: k3mm at comcast.net (Tyler Stewart); Date: Sat Jan 25 15:34:51 2003; I dont think there is any point in arguing about the extra value of SO2R on RTTY. I think it would be pretty hard for any SO1R guy to beat an SO2R guy assuming they both operate full time and the SO2; /archives//html/RTTY/2003-01/msg00354.html (10,324 bytes)
17. [RTTY] SO2R (again) (score: 1): Author: w7ti at dslextreme.com (Bill Turner); Date: Sat Jan 25 16:04:34 2003; _________________________________________________________ Sure. Without examining the World Rank list vs Mike's actual scores, I know the list is heavily weighted toward stations who enter lots of co; /archives//html/RTTY/2003-01/msg00357.html (9,166 bytes)
18. [RTTY] SO2R (again) (score: 1): Author: martyt at pobox.com (Marty Tippin); Date: Sat Jan 25 20:10:48 2003; I'm pretty sure AA5AU, K4GMH and the other "perpetual top 10" group would continue to beat the rest of us, even if they used only one radio and everyone else used two... -NW0L; /archives//html/RTTY/2003-01/msg00360.html (8,800 bytes)
19. [RTTY] SO2R (again) (score: 1): Author: wa9als at starband.net (WA9ALS - John); Date: Sat Jan 25 20:50:10 2003; Hmmm... How about if you place in the top ten using 2R, then you have to use 1R for the next 3 years? harhar ;-)); /archives//html/RTTY/2003-01/msg00362.html (9,021 bytes)
20. [RTTY] SO2R (again) (score: 1): Author: aa5au at bellsouth.net (Don Hill AA5AU); Date: Sat Jan 25 22:22:42 2003; I disagree. I don't think I'm a very good SO1R operator. A good SO1R operator really has to work his/her tail off. A really good SO1R is working twice as hard as an SO2R operator. I admit, I'm spoile; /archives//html/RTTY/2003-01/msg00368.html (10,672 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 20
Page: [1]