- 1. [RTTY] SCC Logging question (score: 1)
- Author: Schulz Jonathan <jonathan.schulz@siemens.com>
- Date: Tue, 2 Sep 2003 11:50:27 -0500
- Hi RTTY Contesters, In this past weekends SCC Contest 2 points were credited for working someone not in your own call area. 1 Point for working stations in your own call area So I work a W9 who I kno
- /archives//html/RTTY/2003-09/msg00013.html (7,691 bytes)
- 2. Re: [RTTY] SCC Logging question (score: 1)
- Author: Bill Turner <wrt@dslextreme.com>
- Date: Tue, 02 Sep 2003 11:20:20 -0700
- _________________________________________________________ I agree, leave it as logged. That way, the worst that could happen is that contact might be DQ'd. If you alter your log to something that was
- /archives//html/RTTY/2003-09/msg00014.html (7,577 bytes)
- 3. Re: [RTTY] SCC Logging question (score: 1)
- Author: "Robert Bajuk" <s57aw@hamradio.si>
- Date: Tue, 2 Sep 2003 20:37:23 +0200
- Hi Jon & others RTTY Contesters, Thanks for pointing out this topic. There was a discussion about to sign or not to sign /area for US hams. A lot of contesters support that idea and have nothing agai
- /archives//html/RTTY/2003-09/msg00015.html (10,308 bytes)
- 4. Re: [RTTY] SCC Logging question (score: 1)
- Author: "Robert Bajuk" <s57aw@hamradio.si>
- Date: Tue, 2 Sep 2003 20:55:33 +0200
- BTW, nice article regarding call areas written by Don-VE3BUC is available on the Eham.net. This is only an extract, full article can be found at: http://www.eham.net/newham/callsigns Robert, S57AW --
- /archives//html/RTTY/2003-09/msg00016.html (11,217 bytes)
- 5. RE: [RTTY] SCC Logging question (score: 1)
- Author: "Don Cassel" <doncassel@compuserve.com>
- Date: Tue, 2 Sep 2003 16:02:43 -0400
- Thanks for the promo Robert. For your info I am now operating as VE3XD since late December 2002 but plan to continue using the VE3BUC call for the eHAM articles. 73, Don VE3XD (VE3BUC) ______________
- /archives//html/RTTY/2003-09/msg00018.html (13,413 bytes)
This search system is powered by
Namazu