Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[RTTY\]\s+Response\s+to\s+DX\s+Station\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[RTTY\]\s+Response\s+to\s+DX\s+Station\s*$/: 21 ]

Total 21 documents matching your query.

1. [RTTY] Response to DX Station (score: 1): Author: W3OA <w3oa@roadrunner.com>; Date: Thu, 11 Aug 2011 15:46:34 -0400; I've just watched the CE0Y/I2DMI and 9X0TL videos. While the multi channel decoders are very cool, what surprised me was the length of the responses from those who had broken the pileups. With over 3; /archives//html/RTTY/2011-08/msg00148.html (7,003 bytes)
2. Re: [RTTY] Response to DX Station (score: 1): Author: Kok Chen <chen@mac.com>; Date: Thu, 11 Aug 2011 15:46:01 -0700; By the way, DL2RUM is not just the op at 9X0TL, Tom himself wrote that program (RUMped) which you see him using. cocoaModem is used just as the RTTY demodulator. Tom also gets the spectrum for his wa; /archives//html/RTTY/2011-08/msg00151.html (8,614 bytes)
3. Re: [RTTY] Response to DX Station (score: 1): Author: "Don Hill AA5AU" <aa5au@bellsouth.net>; Date: Thu, 11 Aug 2011 18:22:06 -0500; Yes, I noticed that too. And during the ST0R operation, I saw stations calling them with ST0R DE W9ABC, etc. Then I saw a lot of replies where stations send the DX callsign. The DX station already kn; /archives//html/RTTY/2011-08/msg00152.html (8,615 bytes)
4. Re: [RTTY] Response to DX Station (score: 1): Author: "Ron Kolarik" <rkolarik@neb.rr.com>; Date: Thu, 11 Aug 2011 20:30:55 -0500; If you could get everyone to read and abide by the DX Code of Conduct it might help http://dx-code.org/ Most DXpeditions have the code or a link to it on their websites, now getting people to actuall; /archives//html/RTTY/2011-08/msg00153.html (8,346 bytes)
5. Re: [RTTY] Response to DX Station (score: 1): Author: "Shelby Summerville" <k4ww@arrl.net>; Date: Fri, 12 Aug 2011 06:17:06 -0400; K0IDT wrote: "If you could get everyone to read and abide by the DX Code of Conduct it might help http://dx-code.org/" As long as DXCC Challenge, DeSoto Cup and the "ego satisfying" attempts to stay; /archives//html/RTTY/2011-08/msg00154.html (7,854 bytes)
6. Re: [RTTY] Response to DX Station (score: 1): Author: Mike Fatchett W0MU <w0mu@w0mu.com>; Date: Fri, 12 Aug 2011 09:51:41 -0600; The one problem with online "logs" is that the DX could have busted a call and logged me instead of W1MU or W9MU. In your scenario I would be penalized because they busted the contact. I don't know h; /archives//html/RTTY/2011-08/msg00155.html (8,808 bytes)
7. Re: [RTTY] Response to DX Station (score: 1): Author: Neal Campbell <abrohamneal@gmail.com>; Date: Fri, 12 Aug 2011 12:05:52 -0400; I the DX station was upset about the multi-band/mode contacts they would stop them! In some ways I think they promote them by setting these high qso objectives and then showing how they beat them. IM; /archives//html/RTTY/2011-08/msg00156.html (11,011 bytes)
8. Re: [RTTY] Response to DX Station (score: 1): Author: Peter Laws <plaws@plaws.net>; Date: Fri, 12 Aug 2011 11:31:26 -0500; I agree with all of these, but .... o I will not trust the DX cluster and will be sure of the DX station's call sign before calling. Very difficult when the DX end goes for along time without IDing a; /archives//html/RTTY/2011-08/msg00157.html (8,810 bytes)
9. Re: [RTTY] Response to DX Station (score: 1): Author: Mike Fatchett W0MU <w0mu@w0mu.com>; Date: Fri, 12 Aug 2011 10:48:30 -0600; Going by USA call area numbers is better than nothing but the numbers no longer mean anything geographically. A W1 can be in California, NY, MN or TX. It is better than nothing. When DX calls for Wes; /archives//html/RTTY/2011-08/msg00158.html (9,249 bytes)
10. Re: [RTTY] Response to DX Station (score: 1): Author: Peter Laws <plaws@plaws.net>; Date: Fri, 12 Aug 2011 12:01:36 -0500; Doesn't matter. If the DX calls for "USA, 5s only" I have much, much (did I mention "much"?) better chance of being heard regardless of whether the other 5s are in ME, WA, FL, or CA! I just wish they; /archives//html/RTTY/2011-08/msg00159.html (9,088 bytes)
11. Re: [RTTY] Response to DX Station (score: 1): Author: Don AA5AU <aa5au@bellsouth.net>; Date: Fri, 12 Aug 2011 10:34:47 -0700 (PDT); I always feel the "need" to bust a pileup even if I don't "need" it. It's the fun of it that drives people to work stations they don't "need" for an award. Some people don't even chase awards, but; /archives//html/RTTY/2011-08/msg00161.html (11,848 bytes)
12. Re: [RTTY] Response to DX Station (score: 1): Author: Don AA5AU <aa5au@bellsouth.net>; Date: Fri, 12 Aug 2011 10:41:01 -0700 (PDT); Peter wrote: "If only all DX would call USA stations by number!" I hate when DX stations go by numbers. It's a cop out for those who do not know how to handle a pileup. It's penalizes good opera; /archives//html/RTTY/2011-08/msg00162.html (10,630 bytes)
13. Re: [RTTY] Response to DX Station (score: 1): Author: Mike Fatchett W0MU <w0mu@w0mu.com>; Date: Fri, 12 Aug 2011 11:55:35 -0600; I have to admit to doing that too but not with stations like ST0R or BS7H. I will work them once per band/mode unless I feel my contact was less than certain. I can't fault people for wanting to brea; /archives//html/RTTY/2011-08/msg00163.html (12,380 bytes)
14. Re: [RTTY] Response to DX Station (score: 1): Author: Neal Campbell <abrohamneal@gmail.com>; Date: Fri, 12 Aug 2011 14:15:26 -0400; I do not think its the "highly skilled" dx'er with a competitive urge that makes things so slow, its the guys who are not on the air a lot but want some new DX that pile on, don't listen, keep callin; /archives//html/RTTY/2011-08/msg00164.html (14,215 bytes)
15. Re: [RTTY] Response to DX Station (score: 1): Author: "Bill, W6WRT" <dezrat1242@yahoo.com>; Date: Fri, 12 Aug 2011 12:07:26 -0700; ORIGINAL MESSAGE: REPLY: Trying to zero beat the last guy only works when there are either 1) Few callers, or 2) You know you are louder than everyone else because of propagation and/or geography. Wi; /archives//html/RTTY/2011-08/msg00166.html (9,206 bytes)
16. Re: [RTTY] Response to DX Station (score: 1): Author: "Bill, W6WRT" <dezrat1242@yahoo.com>; Date: Fri, 12 Aug 2011 12:14:00 -0700; ORIGINAL MESSAGE: REPLY: AMEN. As someone pointed out, numbers in the USA are no longer geographical, and so what? It's just a way of cutting the pileup down by 90 percent at a time. I hope the DX wi; /archives//html/RTTY/2011-08/msg00167.html (9,222 bytes)
17. Re: [RTTY] Response to DX Station (score: 1): Author: iw1ayd <iw1ayd@googlemail.com>; Date: Sat, 13 Aug 2011 00:25:36 +0200; How to say, plainly I think: Don, you get the point, that's it! DX'ing/Contesting/Anything-to-do-with-ham-radio. 73 de iw1ayd Salvo PS ;-> I am not a subject matter expert, but just one of the addict; /archives//html/RTTY/2011-08/msg00169.html (9,152 bytes)
18. Re: [RTTY] Response to DX Station (score: 1): Author: "jim" <wb5aaa@windstream.net>; Date: Fri, 12 Aug 2011 18:38:32 -0500; For me, the problem is the LIDS on the DX stations TX freq.. The US side NUTS I like trying to work them on every BAND/MODE.. Is that not what it is all abt ? from the shack of WB5AAA 73 de JIM K0IDT; /archives//html/RTTY/2011-08/msg00170.html (10,452 bytes)
19. Re: [RTTY] Response to DX Station (score: 1): Author: "Jeff Blaine" <keepwalking188@yahoo.com>; Date: Fri, 12 Aug 2011 20:07:50 -0500; Jim, You are so very right. On both counts. Especially the lids... The urination contests occurring between the over zealous dx police, naive rookies who seem to have no idea of how to properly work; /archives//html/RTTY/2011-08/msg00171.html (12,388 bytes)
20. Re: [RTTY] Response to DX Station (score: 1): Author: Rich NU6T <rehill@ix.netcom.com>; Date: Fri, 12 Aug 2011 18:50:06 -0700; Sometimes the problem is that one man's lid is another man's Elmer. Rich NU6T Strongly recommending "The Complete DXer". _______________________________________________ RTTY mailing list RTTY@contest; /archives//html/RTTY/2011-08/msg00172.html (11,374 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 20
Page: [1] [2]