Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[RTTY\]\s+Re\s+the\s+blacklisting\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[RTTY\]\s+Re\s+the\s+blacklisting\s*$/: 19 ]

Total 19 documents matching your query.

1. [RTTY] Re the blacklisting (score: 1): Author: "Phil Cooper" <pcooper@guernsey.net>; Date: Thu, 12 Apr 2007 18:19:22 +0100; Hi all, I am fairly certain this would NOT have come from Doug N6TQS while operating N8S. I have always found Doug to be an excellent op, with great pile-up skills on RTTY. Whether it is a reasonable; /archives//html/RTTY/2007-04/msg00147.html (8,757 bytes)
2. Re: [RTTY] Re the blacklisting (score: 1): Author: "Byron Lichtenwalner" <w3wkr@verizon.net>; Date: Thu, 12 Apr 2007 15:00:19 -0400; Friends Last week operating on 17 meters I was blessed to have N8S respond to my call. I was using my usual macro that sends my report as "(call) tu 599 in Pa, name is byron k" The respons I received; /archives//html/RTTY/2007-04/msg00150.html (7,244 bytes)
3. Re: [RTTY] Re the blacklisting (score: 1): Author: "Andreas Rehberg" <arehberg@gmx.de>; Date: Thu, 12 Apr 2007 21:27:18 +0200; maybe the OPs are a little stressed, but that's no reason for such a rude behavior.. -- Original-Nachricht -- Datum: Thu, 12 Apr 2007 15:00:19 -0400 Von: "Byron Lichtenwalner" <w3wkr@verizon.net> An:; /archives//html/RTTY/2007-04/msg00151.html (8,144 bytes)
4. Re: [RTTY] Re the blacklisting (score: 1): Author: "Byron Lichtenwalner" <w3wkr@verizon.net>; Date: Thu, 12 Apr 2007 16:35:24 -0400; _______________________________________________ RTTY mailing list RTTY@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/rtty; /archives//html/RTTY/2007-04/msg00154.html (8,747 bytes)
5. Re: [RTTY] Re the blacklisting (score: 1): Author: Kok Chen <chen@mac.com>; Date: Thu, 12 Apr 2007 14:00:16 -0700; I have seen "I don't care who you are or where you are" a few times from N8S, so it is probably a standard macro on one of their computers :-). 73 Chen, W7AY _________________________________________; /archives//html/RTTY/2007-04/msg00156.html (7,658 bytes)
6. Re: [RTTY] Re the blacklisting (score: 1): Author: "K4GM George" <k4gm@verizon.net>; Date: Thu, 12 Apr 2007 15:33:08 -0400; Was that comment from the operator at N8S or one of the DX police ?? George K4GM Friends Last week operating on 17 meters I was blessed to have N8S respond to my call. I was using my usual macro that; /archives//html/RTTY/2007-04/msg00160.html (8,222 bytes)
7. Re: [RTTY] Re the blacklisting (score: 1): Author: Bill Turner <dezrat@copper.net>; Date: Thu, 12 Apr 2007 21:41:09 -0700; ORIGINAL MESSAGE: -- REPLY FOLLOWS -- The infamous "Black Hole" of propagation has apparently moved from the American Midwest to the British Isles. Sorry, Phil! Bill W6WRT ___________________________; /archives//html/RTTY/2007-04/msg00165.html (7,847 bytes)
8. Re: [RTTY] Re the blacklisting (score: 1): Author: Bill Turner <dezrat@copper.net>; Date: Thu, 12 Apr 2007 21:45:00 -0700; ORIGINAL MESSAGE: -- REPLY FOLLOWS -- That was inexcusably rude of them. Let's hope THEY don't make that mistake again. For shame. Bill W6WRT _______________________________________________ RTTY mail; /archives//html/RTTY/2007-04/msg00166.html (7,868 bytes)
9. [RTTY] re the blacklisting (score: 1): Author: Doug Faunt N6TQS +1-510-655-8604 <n6tqs@arrl.net>; Date: Tue, 17 Apr 2007 09:31:59 +0000; If it's rude to tell people what I want to see, so be it. And it's pretty easy to tell if someone calling over others is deliberate, or an accident. Only the most egregious offenders get mentioned. A; /archives//html/RTTY/2007-04/msg00204.html (8,752 bytes)
10. Re: [RTTY] re the blacklisting (score: 1): Author: Bill Turner <dezrat@copper.net>; Date: Tue, 17 Apr 2007 09:40:53 -0700; ORIGINAL MESSAGE: -- REPLY FOLLOWS -- Some stations send up 2 and mean exactly that, no more, no less. I would probably send up 2-5 pr something similar. Not a big deal, most guys figure it out prett; /archives//html/RTTY/2007-04/msg00208.html (8,067 bytes)
11. Re: [RTTY] re the blacklisting (score: 1): Author: Jim Reisert AD1C <jjreisert@alum.mit.edu>; Date: Tue, 17 Apr 2007 10:41:01 -0700 (PDT); Some never do. When I was in the Galapagos in September 2002, I got on 30 meter CW after the RTTY contest was over (after dinner). I ran for a few hours sending "up 1" but the pileup was big. Most of; /archives//html/RTTY/2007-04/msg00209.html (8,964 bytes)
12. Re: [RTTY] re the blacklisting (score: 1): Author: Doug Faunt N6TQS +1-510-655-8604 <faunt@panix.com>; Date: Tue, 17 Apr 2007 14:44:42 -0400 (EDT); I used to send the whole range, and even change it as the pileup got smaller, but decided that the top end was no necssary. I'm no longer sure of that, and changed back to a full definition. I think; /archives//html/RTTY/2007-04/msg00211.html (9,220 bytes)
13. Re: [RTTY] re the blacklisting (score: 1): Author: "Doug Hall" <k4dsp.doug@gmail.com>; Date: Tue, 17 Apr 2007 15:03:16 -0400; I had the same experience while working 30m CW from J3 some years back. For some reason one night the pileup was just huge, tons of EU, and I managed it by sending "UP 1" and working folks who were u; /archives//html/RTTY/2007-04/msg00212.html (8,847 bytes)
14. Re: [RTTY] re the blacklisting (score: 1): Author: Fred Souto Maior <py7zz@soutomaior.eti.br>; Date: Tue, 17 Apr 2007 17:42:04 -0300; I think all dxer's must be able to find where the dx station is receiving. I agree with Doug regarding 2 up mean at least 2 and up depending of the size of the pile-up. We only need to put the other; /archives//html/RTTY/2007-04/msg00213.html (10,885 bytes)
15. Re: [RTTY] re the blacklisting (score: 1): Author: Jim Reisert AD1C <jjreisert@alum.mit.edu>; Date: Tue, 17 Apr 2007 14:05:02 -0700 (PDT); Sometimes yes, sometimes no. There was a major DXpedition within the last two years, I don't remember which one. I tried for days to work them on 30 meters. Due to propagation, you literally could no; /archives//html/RTTY/2007-04/msg00214.html (9,219 bytes)
16. Re: [RTTY] re the blacklisting (score: 1): Author: Bill Turner <dezrat@copper.net>; Date: Tue, 17 Apr 2007 16:51:23 -0700; ORIGINAL MESSAGE: -- REPLY FOLLOWS -- Why would you say up 1 instead of just up? Bill W6WRT _______________________________________________ RTTY mailing list RTTY@contesting.com http://lists.contesti; /archives//html/RTTY/2007-04/msg00216.html (8,011 bytes)
17. Re: [RTTY] re the blacklisting (score: 1): Author: Fred Souto Maior <py7zz@soutomaior.eti.br>; Date: Tue, 17 Apr 2007 21:18:06 -0300; Yes Jim I know that sometimes is difficoult to listen the stations working the dx but for that rare case we must use instinct, know-how to find where to call. I have already saw several cases when th; /archives//html/RTTY/2007-04/msg00217.html (10,084 bytes)
18. Re: [RTTY] re the blacklisting (score: 1): Author: Jim Reisert AD1C <jjreisert@alum.mit.edu>; Date: Wed, 18 Apr 2007 09:58:00 -0700 (PDT); -- Bill Turner <dezrat@copper.net> asked: Sometimes the callers can't hear each other. If I send "UP" do I mean up 1, up 5, what? Plus, up 1 gives enough space to keep my Tx freq clear. Running a pil; /archives//html/RTTY/2007-04/msg00219.html (8,922 bytes)
19. Re: [RTTY] re the blacklisting (score: 1): Author: Bill Turner <dezrat@copper.net>; Date: Wed, 18 Apr 2007 20:49:59 -0700; "UP" without any qualifiers just means higher than your TX frequency. If you mean up 1 or up 5, say so. To avoid a reputation as a prevaricator. Bill W6WRT ___________________________________________; /archives//html/RTTY/2007-04/msg00223.html (8,338 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 19
Page: [1]