Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[RTTY\]\s+Re\s+RSQ\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[RTTY\]\s+Re\s+RSQ\s*$/: 4 ]

Total 4 documents matching your query.

1. [RTTY] Re RSQ (score: 1): Author: "Phil Cooper" <pcooper@guernsey.net>; Date: Wed, 29 Aug 2007 17:41:17 +0100; Hi all, OK, I had not seen the www.rsq-info.net website, and had not heard of RSQ reporting before. (Thanks for the link Ian GM4KLN) I can see the merits of it for PSK - to a point, but since those f; /archives//html/RTTY/2007-08/msg00164.html (7,631 bytes)
2. Re: [RTTY] Re RSQ (score: 1): Author: "Scott Schultz" <scottaschultz@juno.com>; Date: Wed, 29 Aug 2007 12:14:12 -0500; Like most of you, it is pretty rare that I receive anything other than a 59(9) for a casual contact regardless of mode. I use a 756Pro running 100 watts (40-50 watts +/- for PSK/MFSK/Hellschreiber) i; /archives//html/RTTY/2007-08/msg00166.html (9,480 bytes)
3. Re: [RTTY] Re RSQ (score: 1): Author: "Tom Osborne" <w7why@verizon.net>; Date: Wed, 29 Aug 2007 11:30:59 -0700; HI Scott I'm sure most reports, plus name, QTH, ext, are all in a macro. I notice when I call a lot of stations, they will hunt and peck my call, then the name, etc, all come barreling out at full sp; /archives//html/RTTY/2007-08/msg00167.html (6,727 bytes)
4. Re: [RTTY] Re RSQ (score: 1): Author: ns5b@comcast.net; Date: Wed, 29 Aug 2007 19:19:21 +0000; After being away from this for so long, I'm about to get back into it real soon. But, I have to admit, I ALSO had macros that would send my info too. The difference was, I had several of them that I; /archives//html/RTTY/2007-08/msg00168.html (7,769 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 4
Page: [1]