Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[RTTY\]\s+Re\:\s+Help\s+with\s+keeping\s+RF\s+out\s+of\s+PC\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[RTTY\]\s+Re\:\s+Help\s+with\s+keeping\s+RF\s+out\s+of\s+PC\s*$/: 3 ]

Total 3 documents matching your query.

1. [RTTY] Re: Help with keeping RF out of PC (score: 1): Author: knormoyle@comcast.net; Date: Tue, 11 Jan 2005 20:18:22 +0000; Actually, the Rigblaster+ only isolates the pc to rig xmit audio with a transformer? There is no isolation of rig rcv audio to pc. They say to just use a straight cable. Schematic is at http://www.w; /archives//html/RTTY/2005-01/msg00160.html (7,045 bytes)
2. RE: [RTTY] Re: Help with keeping RF out of PC (score: 1): Author: Jim McDonald <jim@n7us.net>; Date: Tue, 11 Jan 2005 14:29:40 -0700; The RigBlaster Pro isolates the receive cables, but I don't believe the Plus does. Jim N7US _______________________________________________ RTTY mailing list RTTY@contesting.com http://lists.contesti; /archives//html/RTTY/2005-01/msg00162.html (8,015 bytes)
3. [RTTY] Re: Help with keeping RF out of PC (score: 1): Author: Phil Duff NA4M <na4m@arrl.net>; Date: Thu, 13 Jan 2005 17:39:54 +0000; At 16:53 1/13/2005, Bill Turner wrote: The better approach is to prevent the RF from getting into the computer in the first place. Ferrite is your friend. Also your friend is a high quality PC enclos; /archives//html/RTTY/2005-01/msg00183.html (9,143 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 3
Page: [1]