Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[RTTY\]\s+Re\:\s+\[CQ\-Contest\]\s+So2R\-\-try\s+writing\s+a\s+rule\s+separating\s+SO2R\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[RTTY\]\s+Re\:\s+\[CQ\-Contest\]\s+So2R\-\-try\s+writing\s+a\s+rule\s+separating\s+SO2R\s*$/: 2 ]

Total 2 documents matching your query.

1. [RTTY] Re: [CQ-Contest] So2R--try writing a rule separating SO2R (score: 1): Author: k4ww at arrl.net (Shelby Summerville); Date: Sun Jan 26 03:51:42 2003; "W. Wright, W5XD" <w5xd@writelog.com wrote: "In my opinion its time to either shut up or do something. So I'd like to see an advocate of the separate SO2R category post a definition of SO2R IN WRITIN; /archives//html/RTTY/2003-01/msg00372.html (7,639 bytes)
2. [RTTY] Re: [CQ-Contest] So2R--try writing a rule separating SO2R (score: 1): Author: k4ww at arrl.net (Shelby Summerville); Date: Sun Jan 26 10:23:08 2003; "When will any/all understand that there is no "campaign" to separate SO2R?" What I intended to say is: "no campaign to restrict or penalize"! Separate--yes Restrict or penalize--not at all C'Ya, She; /archives//html/RTTY/2003-01/msg00383.html (7,332 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 2
Page: [1]