Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[RTTY\]\s+RTTY\s+reversebeacon\s+spotting\s+network\s+wow\!\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[RTTY\]\s+RTTY\s+reversebeacon\s+spotting\s+network\s+wow\!\s*$/: 4 ]

Total 4 documents matching your query.

1. [RTTY] RTTY reversebeacon spotting network wow! (score: 1): Author: Tim Shoppa <tshoppa@gmail.com>; Date: Mon, 29 Sep 2014 09:36:47 -0400; Last year I was pretty much full-time in CQ WW RTTY and went unassisted after being not particularly impressed by RTTY spots from skimmers. This year, while helping some local friends get up to speed; /archives//html/RTTY/2014-09/msg00123.html (7,356 bytes)
2. Re: [RTTY] RTTY reversebeacon spotting network wow! (score: 1): Author: Richard Ferch <ve3iay@storm.ca>; Date: Mon, 29 Sep 2014 11:29:43 -0400; In addition to the S&P stations being spotted, there were also some running stations who did not leave spaces on the end of their CQ messages so that their call signs showed up multiple times with ex; /archives//html/RTTY/2014-09/msg00126.html (9,310 bytes)
3. Re: [RTTY] RTTY reversebeacon spotting network wow! (score: 1): Author: Richard Ferch <ve3iay@storm.ca>; Date: Mon, 29 Sep 2014 14:03:27 -0400; After consulting the list of strings that the RTTY skimmer recognizes (see <http://wz7i.com/cw-skimmer/rtty-skimmer.html>) and thinking a bit more, I think I know what it is about the CQing style tha; /archives//html/RTTY/2014-09/msg00133.html (9,335 bytes)
4. Re: [RTTY] RTTY reversebeacon spotting network wow! (score: 1): Author: "Jeff AC0C" <keepwalking188@ac0c.com>; Date: Mon, 29 Sep 2014 13:16:02 -0500; Making the software decode logic more intelligent is the better solution. The run format is a highly debated and sensitive subject. Space-CALL-space-CQ-space at the end the standard practice used by; /archives//html/RTTY/2014-09/msg00134.html (10,328 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 4
Page: [1]