Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[RTTY\]\s+RTTY\s+bands\s+need\s+to\s+be\s+wider\!\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[RTTY\]\s+RTTY\s+bands\s+need\s+to\s+be\s+wider\!\s*$/: 2 ]

Total 2 documents matching your query.

1. [RTTY] RTTY bands need to be wider! (score: 1): Author: RLVZ--- via RTTY <rtty@contesting.com>; Date: Mon, 28 Sep 2015 16:59:08 -0400; I'd like to support an effort to increase the size of the RTTY bands on all bands. Such as: 14080 to 14150 wasn't nearly wide enough for this weekends CQWW0RTTY Test. I love CW, but why does CW get t; /archives//html/RTTY/2015-09/msg00106.html (7,187 bytes)
2. Re: [RTTY] RTTY bands need to be wider! (score: 1): Author: Jeff Stai <wk6i.jeff@gmail.com>; Date: Mon, 28 Sep 2015 14:21:47 -0700; 14000-14150 is available for RTTY in the US. Since 14070-14080 have other fun digital modes living there by agreement, you can go below 14070, and on down. In fact there were many signals down there; /archives//html/RTTY/2015-09/msg00110.html (8,171 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 2
Page: [1]