Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[RTTY\]\s+RTTY\s+Digest\,\s+Vol\s+57\,\s+Issue\s+31\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[RTTY\]\s+RTTY\s+Digest\,\s+Vol\s+57\,\s+Issue\s+31\s*$/: 2 ]

Total 2 documents matching your query.

1. Re: [RTTY] RTTY Digest, Vol 57, Issue 31 (score: 1): Author: billknn@aol.com; Date: Mon, 17 Sep 2007 21:00:24 -0400; "...If you would deny a certain group of top operators the right to participate against ALL single operator stations because one of the tools they choose is SO2R,..." I must have missed the post wher; /archives//html/RTTY/2007-09/msg00190.html (7,494 bytes)
2. Re: [RTTY] RTTY Digest, Vol 57, Issue 31 (score: 1): Author: "Joe Subich, W4TV" <w4tv@subich.com>; Date: Mon, 17 Sep 2007 21:25:31 -0400; You weren't paying attention to the demands that SO2R be made a separate category (whether it be a separate category for SO2R or a category for "SO1R ONLY" the effect is the same). Not hardly - that; /archives//html/RTTY/2007-09/msg00191.html (9,335 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 2
Page: [1]