Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[RTTY\]\s+RTTY\s+Contesting\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[RTTY\]\s+RTTY\s+Contesting\s*$/: 7 ]

Total 7 documents matching your query.

1. [RTTY] RTTY Contesting (score: 1): Author: Stu Ritter <ritter@privatei.com>; Date: Tue, 24 Mar 2009 13:44:11 -0600; Hi, I'm a contesting newbie. I've been away from HF in any form for 15 years and am just starting up again. I've done 2 RTTY tests and really enjoyed it. A lot different than it was 20 years ago! I w; /archives//html/RTTY/2009-03/msg00336.html (7,457 bytes)
2. Re: [RTTY] RTTY Contesting (score: 1): Author: "Don Hill AA5AU" <aa5au@bellsouth.net>; Date: Wed, 25 Mar 2009 21:22:58 -0500; Hi Stu and welcome back to RTTY contesting. I show you in my log for a WPX RTTY contest back in the 90's. Glad you're back... There are probably a lot of readers on this reflector who would die for a; /archives//html/RTTY/2009-03/msg00346.html (10,695 bytes)
3. Re: [RTTY] RTTY Contesting (score: 1): Author: ki6dy@sbcglobal.net; Date: Wed, 25 Mar 2009 19:39:49 -0700 (PDT); I agree with Don, the C4 is a great antenna. I owned one for several years and was really happy with it. I have since upgraded to the C31-XR which is obviously a better antenna but with conditions as; /archives//html/RTTY/2009-03/msg00347.html (12,145 bytes)
4. Re: [RTTY] RTTY Contesting (score: 1): Author: "John Barber GW4SKA" <ska@bartg.org.uk>; Date: Thu, 26 Mar 2009 03:57:16 -0800; Just a note on verticals. Don't write off running a vertical with limited radials or not on the ground. It's not the right way to do it but can still give reasonable results if there is no other opti; /archives//html/RTTY/2009-03/msg00355.html (14,655 bytes)
5. Re: [RTTY] RTTY Contesting (score: 1): Author: Curt Nixon <cptcurt@flash.net>; Date: Thu, 26 Mar 2009 11:38:24 -0400; I agree regarding the vertical placed at Gnd Level vs roof mount. And the lower you go in freq, the more difficult the rooftop radials get. Along the lines of the dipole for 80M, Don, have you had an; /archives//html/RTTY/2009-03/msg00357.html (12,490 bytes)
6. Re: [RTTY] RTTY Contesting (score: 1): Author: Kok Chen <chen@mac.com>; Date: Thu, 26 Mar 2009 09:54:57 -0700; If you are interested in raised counterpoises for vertical antennas, then I would highly recommend getting hold of Rudy Severns N6LF's articles "Experimental Determination of Ground System Performanc; /archives//html/RTTY/2009-03/msg00359.html (8,858 bytes)
7. [RTTY] RTTY Contesting (score: 1): Author: Stu Ritter <ritter@privatei.com>; Date: Fri, 27 Mar 2009 13:07:38 -0600; I would like to thank everyone who has taken part in this conversation so far. Some very interesting thoughts and information for someone who is just setting up. again, thanks, Stu N0LEF ____________; /archives//html/RTTY/2009-03/msg00373.html (7,252 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 7
Page: [1]