Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[RTTY\]\s+RTTY\s+AWARD\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[RTTY\]\s+RTTY\s+AWARD\s*$/: 8 ]

Total 8 documents matching your query.

1. [RTTY] RTTY AWARD (score: 1): Author: Marc Chicoine <wa1stwxx@yahoo.com>; Date: Tue, 16 Aug 2011 22:32:21 -0700 (PDT); Why, after the huge upturn in worldwide RTTY contesting during the past several years, would ARRL decide to eliminate the RTTY designation from awards? I suspect the Newington decision makers do not; /archives//html/RTTY/2011-08/msg00208.html (6,923 bytes)
2. Re: [RTTY] RTTY AWARD (score: 1): Author: Andrei Stchislenok <asnp3d@gmail.com>; Date: Wed, 17 Aug 2011 06:38:07 -0400; *I suspect the Newington decision makers do not operate RTTY at all. * SURE THEY DON'T. THEY HAVE NO CLUE, SORRY... -- 73's Andrei EW1AR-NP3D -- DXCC RTTY via LoTW only Who has what? - World Wide Rat; /archives//html/RTTY/2011-08/msg00209.html (7,423 bytes)
3. Re: [RTTY] RTTY AWARD (score: 1): Author: "Tom Homewood" <w1to@roadrunner.com>; Date: Wed, 17 Aug 2011 19:25:16 -0400; I know at least two active RTTY contesters from ARRL and operate with them often. Maybe they weren't consulted about DXCC. 73, Tom, W1TO Why, after the huge upturn in worldwide RTTY contesting during; /archives//html/RTTY/2011-08/msg00219.html (7,738 bytes)
4. Re: [RTTY] RTTY AWARD (score: 1): Author: Kok Chen <chen@mac.com>; Date: Wed, 17 Aug 2011 17:11:42 -0700; Your suspicions are likely to be erroneous. Check your 2009 RTTY Roundup log. Chances are that K1ZZ is in that log. At least he is in my log. Since the state exchange I received was CT, it is not lik; /archives//html/RTTY/2011-08/msg00220.html (7,346 bytes)
5. Re: [RTTY] RTTY AWARD (score: 1): Author: WS7I <ws7ik7tj@gmail.com>; Date: Wed, 17 Aug 2011 18:24:47 -0700; That was of course Mark K1RO, who won the 2002 ARRL RTTY Roundup, while he operated none other than K1ZZ's station. Mark held so many jobs at HQ that it was too bad when he relocated. He was of cours; /archives//html/RTTY/2011-08/msg00221.html (9,622 bytes)
6. Re: [RTTY] RTTY AWARD (score: 1): Author: Ian White GM3SEK <gm3sek@ifwtech.co.uk>; Date: Thu, 18 Aug 2011 08:55:58 +0100; That simply isn't the point. The decision was driven *exclusively* by ARRL's policy that there will NO new categories or sub-category endorsements for DXCC awards. RTTY is not the first community wit; /archives//html/RTTY/2011-08/msg00222.html (8,633 bytes)
7. Re: [RTTY] RTTY AWARD (score: 1): Author: iw1ayd <iw1ayd@googlemail.com>; Date: Thu, 18 Aug 2011 11:50:55 +0200; Hello to all. Just few notes from the desk here. I agreed and still agree silently with Fabi VA2UP and Bill W6WRT. I appreciated their words and I would stay silent but sometimes I couldn't resist .; /archives//html/RTTY/2011-08/msg00223.html (10,328 bytes)
8. Re: [RTTY] RTTY AWARD (score: 1): Author: WS7I <ws7ik7tj@gmail.com>; Date: Thu, 18 Aug 2011 07:33:58 -0700; As I indicated previously. "no dog in this but..." *http://tinyurl.com/3g4axbh* _______________________________________________ RTTY mailing list RTTY@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailm; /archives//html/RTTY/2011-08/msg00227.html (9,623 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 8
Page: [1]