Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[RTTY\]\s+RM\-11708\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[RTTY\]\s+RM\-11708\s*$/: 65 ]

Total 65 documents matching your query.

21. Re: [RTTY] RM-11708 (score: 1): Author: W0MU Mike Fatchett <w0mu@w0mu.com>; Date: Mon, 09 Jun 2014 08:42:07 -0600; The ARRL does not care about deliberate interference. They do it on a daily basis with the bulletins and code practice sessions and they either don't care or talked themselves into believing that the; /archives//html/RTTY/2014-06/msg00095.html (18,560 bytes)
22. Re: [RTTY] RM-11708 (score: 1): Author: Paul Stoetzer <n8hm@arrl.net>; Date: Mon, 9 Jun 2014 10:45:25 -0400; The ARRL has a very reasonable interpretation of the regulation. In our system of law, reading between the lines is required. 73, Paul, N8HM _______________________________________________ RTTY maili; /archives//html/RTTY/2014-06/msg00096.html (23,368 bytes)
23. Re: [RTTY] RM-11708 (score: 1): Author: "Joe Subich, W4TV" <lists@subich.com>; Date: Mon, 09 Jun 2014 10:55:24 -0400; On 2014-06-09 10:42 AM, W0MU Mike Fatchett wrote: The ARRL does not care about deliberate interference. They do it on a daily basis with the bulletins and code practice sessions and they either don't; /archives//html/RTTY/2014-06/msg00097.html (18,985 bytes)
24. Re: [RTTY] RM-11708 (score: 1): Author: W0MU Mike Fatchett <w0mu@w0mu.com>; Date: Mon, 09 Jun 2014 09:09:14 -0600; Paul. Apparently you missed the email I received from the FCC that stated that the regulation quoted that allows them to pay a control op does not allow them to ignore any other rule. We are talking; /archives//html/RTTY/2014-06/msg00098.html (22,091 bytes)
25. Re: [RTTY] RM-11708 (score: 1): Author: Paul Stoetzer <n8hm@arrl.net>; Date: Mon, 9 Jun 2014 11:20:29 -0400; You did not receive an email from the FCC. You received an email from an individual who happens to work at the FCC. I can opine about all sorts of things that my employer is involved in. It shouldn't; /archives//html/RTTY/2014-06/msg00099.html (31,924 bytes)
26. Re: [RTTY] RM-11708 (score: 1): Author: W0MU Mike Fatchett <w0mu@w0mu.com>; Date: Mon, 09 Jun 2014 10:06:13 -0600; If the ARRL Can claim unrestricted use of a set of frequencies, so can anyone. If you want to twist a rule that simply allows them to pay a control into a a completely new rule that says they effecti; /archives//html/RTTY/2014-06/msg00100.html (24,113 bytes)
27. Re: [RTTY] RM-11708 (score: 1): Author: Mike Tessmer <mtessmer@mindspring.com>; Date: Mon, 9 Jun 2014 21:32:37 -0400 (GMT-04:00); from [W0MU Mike Fatchett] Mike Please cite specific examples of this deliberate interference - more than one, please, since you have stated that this has been going on daily, for years. Please includ; /archives//html/RTTY/2014-06/msg00102.html (8,771 bytes)
28. Re: [RTTY] RM-11708 (score: 1): Author: W0MU Mike Fatchett <w0mu@w0mu.com>; Date: Mon, 09 Jun 2014 21:50:59 -0600; Failing to listen prior to using a frequency constitutes willful interference. When they fire up 6 or more transmitters each and everyday at various times without ever listening most people would dra; /archives//html/RTTY/2014-06/msg00103.html (10,893 bytes)
29. Re: [RTTY] RM-11708 (score: 1): Author: Michael Adams <mda@n1en.org>; Date: Tue, 10 Jun 2014 11:13:33 +0000; I'm not the Mike to whom the question was asked, but I would point out that I'm pretty sure this particular equine carcass was likely adequately flogged as part of the K1MAN case. Looking through the; /archives//html/RTTY/2014-06/msg00104.html (9,034 bytes)
30. Re: [RTTY] RM-11708 (score: 1): Author: David Cole <dave@nk7z.net>; Date: Tue, 10 Jun 2014 06:28:59 -0700; Hello, Could we change the message subject to something like "Argument about W1AW", so I can build a filter to remove them all as they arrive please?... This has zero to do with RM-11708, which the s; /archives//html/RTTY/2014-06/msg00105.html (12,804 bytes)
31. Re: [RTTY] RM-11708 (score: 1): Author: Tim Shoppa <tshoppa@gmail.com>; Date: Tue, 10 Jun 2014 09:41:52 -0400; Mike, you may not have interpreted what I wrote to you in the manner I intended. I've been on 3581.5kc RTTY when W1AW CW bulletin came up underneath me on a weeknight. I did the reasonable thing and; /archives//html/RTTY/2014-06/msg00108.html (8,655 bytes)
32. Re: [RTTY] RM-11708 (score: 1): Author: "Joe Subich, W4TV" <lists@subich.com>; Date: Tue, 10 Jun 2014 10:41:56 -0400; On 2014-06-10 9:41 AM, Tim Shoppa wrote: Mike, you may not have interpreted what I wrote to you in the manner I intended. I've been on 3581.5kc RTTY when W1AW CW bulletin came up underneath me on a w; /archives//html/RTTY/2014-06/msg00109.html (10,186 bytes)
33. Re: [RTTY] RM-11708 (score: 1): Author: Peter Laws <plaws@plaws.net>; Date: Tue, 10 Jun 2014 10:12:23 -0500; Contestant: "I'll take Impossibilities for $400, Alex." Alex: "Relevant subject lines and trimming replies." Contestant: "What two things will never happen on the internet?" -- Peter Laws | N5UWY | p; /archives//html/RTTY/2014-06/msg00110.html (8,810 bytes)
34. Re: [RTTY] RM-11708 (score: 1): Author: David Cole <dave@nk7z.net>; Date: Tue, 10 Jun 2014 08:32:51 -0700; 1. Caring for others... 2. The ability to perform simple tasks that make it simpler for others... Honestly guys, I would like to not filter by name, as some of you who are off on the W1AW tangent, ac; /archives//html/RTTY/2014-06/msg00111.html (9,806 bytes)
35. Re: [RTTY] RM-11708 (score: 1): Author: "Tom Magarelli" <wa2pni@verizon.net>; Date: Tue, 10 Jun 2014 12:00:56 -0400; Maybe it was noted before. But is there a time frame when RM-11708 will be reviewed and or voted on by The FCC. Basically when will we know the outcome of it ? Rejected or accepted ? 1. Caring for ot; /archives//html/RTTY/2014-06/msg00112.html (11,146 bytes)
36. Re: [RTTY] RM-11708 (score: 1): Author: Peter Laws <plaws@plaws.net>; Date: Tue, 10 Jun 2014 12:05:32 -0500; The comment period never closed, did it? Usually those are only open for a fixed period, but I think we're nearly 6 months in at this point. If I'm correct then the answer is probably "not any time s; /archives//html/RTTY/2014-06/msg00118.html (10,165 bytes)
37. Re: [RTTY] RM-11708 (score: 1): Author: "Joe Subich, W4TV" <lists@subich.com>; Date: Tue, 10 Jun 2014 14:03:38 -0400; The comment period is officially closed. However, the Commission tends to "slow walk" amateur matters and generally consider all comments they receive prior to the time that staff prepares a recomme; /archives//html/RTTY/2014-06/msg00121.html (11,878 bytes)
38. [RTTY] RM-11708 (score: 1): Author: Ron Kolarik <rkolarik@neb.rr.com>; Date: Sat, 21 Feb 2015 00:23:28 -0600; If you don't care about this delete it now. The most recent ARRL Letter has as it's first article a warning about the Mitre license for experimental wideband digital tests. You can read it on the ARR; /archives//html/RTTY/2015-02/msg00140.html (6,907 bytes)
39. Re: [RTTY] RM-11708 (score: 1): Author: ham <ham@odsgc.net>; Date: Sat, 21 Feb 2015 10:46:36 -0600; Ron Great point.... Jim AC0E Sent from my Verizon Wireless 4G LTE smartphone The most recent ARRL Letter has as it's first article a warning about the Mitre license for experimental wideband digital; /archives//html/RTTY/2015-02/msg00141.html (7,561 bytes)
40. Re: [RTTY] RM-11708 (score: 1): Author: W0MU Mike Fatchett <w0mu@w0mu.com>; Date: Sat, 21 Feb 2015 16:10:12 -0700; You can't reason with Politicians and sadly the ARRL is just another political body. Their goals and profit may or may not line up with ours. They think they have all the clout and flex their muscles; /archives//html/RTTY/2015-02/msg00143.html (8,067 bytes)

Current List: 21 - 40
Page: [1] [2] [3] [4]