Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[RTTY\]\s+RESULTS\:\s+Icom\s+IC\-756\s+PRO\s+III\s+vs\.\s+IC\-7600\s+on\s+RTTY\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[RTTY\]\s+RESULTS\:\s+Icom\s+IC\-756\s+PRO\s+III\s+vs\.\s+IC\-7600\s+on\s+RTTY\s*$/: 2 ]

Total 2 documents matching your query.

1. [RTTY] RESULTS: Icom IC-756 PRO III vs. IC-7600 on RTTY (score: 1): Author: "Don Hill AA5AU" <aa5au@bellsouth.net>; Date: Thu, 13 Aug 2009 23:10:11 -0500; I several replies from 7600/7700/PRO III owners. The general consensus is that the 7600 is better than the PRO III in many aspects, mainly: Better Display Possibly better TPF Better 3rd order IMD rej; /archives//html/RTTY/2009-08/msg00017.html (10,766 bytes)
2. Re: [RTTY] RESULTS: Icom IC-756 PRO III vs. IC-7600 on RTTY (score: 1): Author: John Elsik <wa5zup@msn.com>; Date: Fri, 14 Aug 2009 07:04:51 -0600; Hi Don Something to add: The DSP is better/more powerful in the later Icom versions 7600 & 7700. Overall I think the 7600 is a step up, not back, over the proIII. Now that the question of the TPF has; /archives//html/RTTY/2009-08/msg00019.html (12,902 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 2
Page: [1]