- 1. [RTTY] Query (score: 1)
- Author: "allan1 dejazzd.com" <allan1@dejazzd.com>
- Date: Sat, 28 Mar 2009 08:23:13 -0400
- I just read the article in 1999 QSTconcerning the RITTY software. It sounds like the greatest thing since sliced bread for RTTY, especially the autotunewhixh will tune in weak sigs). Is it still avai
- /archives//html/RTTY/2009-03/msg00380.html (6,572 bytes)
- 2. Re: [RTTY] Query (score: 1)
- Author: Jim Reisert AD1C <jjreisert@alum.mit.edu>
- Date: Sat, 28 Mar 2009 13:58:42 -0400
- Brian K6STI stopped working on and distributing RITTY many years ago (it topped out at version 4.53 or something like that). I think Win98 was the last O/S that ran it OK, it was not designed to work
- /archives//html/RTTY/2009-03/msg00381.html (7,523 bytes)
- 3. Re: [RTTY] Query (score: 1)
- Author: "Bill, W6WRT" <dezrat1242@yahoo.com>
- Date: Sat, 28 Mar 2009 14:00:56 -0700
- ORIGINAL MESSAGE: REPLY: It is not likely you can obtain a copy, but you can try. The author is Brian Beezley, K6STI. He became outraged (rightfully so) at some piracy which was done back in the '90s
- /archives//html/RTTY/2009-03/msg00384.html (8,449 bytes)
- 4. Re: [RTTY] Query (score: 1)
- Author: Jeff Blaine <keepwalking188@yahoo.com>
- Date: Sun, 29 Mar 2009 19:59:36 -0500
- Hi Bill, Great information on RITTY. It's a real shame that code could not be rolled into a modern program. As far as I've seen, none of the modern decoders are said to work as well. But then again,
- /archives//html/RTTY/2009-03/msg00387.html (9,514 bytes)
- 5. Re: [RTTY] Query (score: 1)
- Author: "Bill, W6WRT" <dezrat1242@yahoo.com>
- Date: Sun, 29 Mar 2009 19:29:11 -0700
- ORIGINAL MESSAGE: REPLY: The only conclusion I have come to is that the IIR detector works the best for me. The FIR is second and the PLL a distant third. A word of caution however - the choice is pr
- /archives//html/RTTY/2009-03/msg00389.html (8,258 bytes)
This search system is powered by
Namazu