- 1. [RTTY] QTC IN WAE RTTY (score: 1)
- Author: VE2RYY <ve2ryy@globetrotter.net>
- Date: Thu, 02 Nov 2006 09:20:08 -0500
- Hi I was told yesterday, that it was better to send or receive QTC's on 80 40 than 20 15 10M, because you have more points on 80 40 than 20 15 and 10M I think this is not right, beause scrore is calc
- /archives//html/RTTY/2006-11/msg00002.html (6,479 bytes)
- 2. Re: [RTTY] QTC IN WAE RTTY (score: 1)
- Author: Barry <w2up@mindspring.com>
- Date: Thu, 02 Nov 2006 10:41:10 -0500
- Noel, You are correct. It doesn't matter where you send QTCs. As a matter of fact I try to avoid 80m for QTC, even though stations ask. There's just too much QRN, etc to reliably copy all but the lou
- /archives//html/RTTY/2006-11/msg00003.html (7,508 bytes)
- 3. Re: [RTTY] QTC IN WAE RTTY (score: 1)
- Author: "Phil Cooper" <pcooper@guernsey.net>
- Date: Thu, 2 Nov 2006 18:32:56 -0000
- Hello Noel andd the group, Yes, Barry is correct, there is NO weighting for the QTC's, only for the mults. I re-checked the rules, and cannot see where this idea may have come from. It doesn't even r
- /archives//html/RTTY/2006-11/msg00004.html (7,836 bytes)
- 4. Re: [RTTY] QTC IN WAE RTTY (score: 1)
- Author: Nils Collin <sm6bsk@glocalnet.net>
- Date: Thu, 02 Nov 2006 22:18:48 +0000
- Hi all, The simple score formula could be written this way: (qso +qtc)*mults = qso*mults + qtc*mults which means that the qtc:s are also weighted by band (as well as the qso:s). But I don´t thi
- /archives//html/RTTY/2006-11/msg00006.html (8,800 bytes)
- 5. Re: [RTTY] QTC IN WAE RTTY (score: 1)
- Author: Nils Collin <nils.collin@glocalnet.net>
- Date: Thu, 02 Nov 2006 23:15:01 +0000
- Hi again all, Sri, but I was fooled by this line: After consulting the rules I understand that the scoring formula is: (sum of qso:s on all bands + sum of qtc:s on all bands) * sum of mults on all ba
- /archives//html/RTTY/2006-11/msg00007.html (8,441 bytes)
This search system is powered by
Namazu