Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[RTTY\]\s+QSO\s+Points\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[RTTY\]\s+QSO\s+Points\s*$/: 3 ]

Total 3 documents matching your query.

1. [RTTY] QSO Points (score: 1): Author: "Don Cassel" <ve3xd@rogers.com>; Date: Tue, 15 Nov 2005 09:22:25 -0500; Hi Jack, I noticed the same thing but since 3830 is only a reflector the actual points number is not important so I just put in a 1. The score is the thing everybody looks at there. I checked the DAR; /archives//html/RTTY/2005-11/msg00132.html (7,072 bytes)
2. [RTTY] QSO Points (score: 1): Author: "Don Cassel" <ve3xd@rogers.com>; Date: Tue, 15 Nov 2005 09:25:59 -0500; Actually I stand corrected on my definition of points. I agree that should be the sum of QSOs and QTCs. However, Writelog does also calculate the band factor which is also not shown directly in the s; /archives//html/RTTY/2005-11/msg00133.html (7,108 bytes)
3. Re: [RTTY] QSO Points (score: 1): Author: "Scott Nichols" <snichols@mvosprey.com>; Date: Tue, 15 Nov 2005 10:59:34 -0400; There shouldn't even be a "Points" column in the 3830 score summary...This is what is confusing everyone...MULTS are weighted by band, not QSO's, so points are irrelevant...And to make it worse, WL S; /archives//html/RTTY/2005-11/msg00136.html (8,390 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 3
Page: [1]