Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[RTTY\]\s+PSK\s+and\s+waterfall\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[RTTY\]\s+PSK\s+and\s+waterfall\s*$/: 7 ]

Total 7 documents matching your query.

1. Re: [RTTY] PSK and waterfall (score: 1): Author: "pcooper" <pcooper@guernsey.net>; Date: Wed, 14 Feb 2007 13:58:51 +0000; Hi all, I don't think this topic is worth too much mileage here, but it has raised a couple of interesting points. RTTY interference is certainly going to cause loads of problems if it is that close; /archives//html/RTTY/2007-02/msg00234.html (8,729 bytes)
2. Re: [RTTY] PSK and waterfall (score: 1): Author: "Joe Subich, W4TV" <w4tv@subich.com>; Date: Wed, 14 Feb 2007 09:27:03 -0500; That is not a matter of power level but of improperly setting the audio drive to the transmitter. A high power signal cal be just as clean as a QRP signal if the operator takes precautions not to ov; /archives//html/RTTY/2007-02/msg00237.html (11,238 bytes)
3. Re: [RTTY] PSK and waterfall (score: 1): Author: Laurent Ferracci <l.ferracci@comeca-group.com>; Date: Wed, 14 Feb 2007 16:03:59 +0100; pcooper a écrit : Well, another problem with PSK is that many PSK users are not avid DXers, just rag-chewers, and they don't know how to make a QSO in a pile-up. They will at least give the DX; /archives//html/RTTY/2007-02/msg00240.html (7,613 bytes)
4. Re: [RTTY] PSK and waterfall (score: 1): Author: Bill Turner <dezrat@copper.net>; Date: Wed, 14 Feb 2007 08:38:58 -0800; ORIGINAL MESSAGE: -- REPLY FOLLOWS -- Deep down in my heart I am a DXer first, contester a close second and rag chewer a distant third. It saddens me to see the "PSK is a low power mode" mantra repea; /archives//html/RTTY/2007-02/msg00246.html (8,048 bytes)
5. [RTTY] PSK and waterfall (score: 1): Author: "John - AI4FR" <AI4FR@Tampabay.rr.com>; Date: Wed, 14 Feb 2007 11:47:50 -0500; Toss in the manual notch filter as well to take out a few more Hz or that strong near by station. Also, the IF shift can be a great help in some rigs to employ. John / AI4FR -- Message: 7 Date: Wed,; /archives//html/RTTY/2007-02/msg00247.html (7,740 bytes)
6. Re: [RTTY] PSK and waterfall (score: 1): Author: "F.R. Ashley" <gdadx2@clearwire.net>; Date: Wed, 14 Feb 2007 12:26:53 -0500; ITs not the high power, its the overdriven signal behind that 600 watts! 73 Buddy WB4M _______________________________________________ RTTY mailing list RTTY@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.co; /archives//html/RTTY/2007-02/msg00266.html (9,242 bytes)
7. Re: [RTTY] PSK and waterfall (score: 1): Author: Bill Turner <dezrat@copper.net>; Date: Thu, 15 Feb 2007 09:23:31 -0800; ORIGINAL MESSAGE: -- REPLY FOLLOWS -- I take that to mean that ten watts overdriven is tolerable where 600 watts overdriven is not? I would agree, but that's an argument against overdriving, not agai; /archives//html/RTTY/2007-02/msg00278.html (7,807 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 7
Page: [1]